In the past years, the field of collaborative robots has been developing fast, with applications ranging from health care to search and rescue, construction, entertainment, sports, and many others. However, current social robotics is still far from the general abilities we expect in a robot collaborator. This limitation is more evident when robots are faced with real-life contexts and activities occurring over long periods. In this article, we argue that human-robot collaboration is more than just being able to work side by side on complementary tasks: collaboration is a complex relational process that entails mutual understanding and reciprocal adaptation. Drawing on this assumption, we propose to shift the focus from "human-robot interaction"to "human-robot shared experience."We hold that for enabling the emergence of such shared experiential space between humans and robots, constructs such as coadaptation, intersubjectivity, individual differences, and identity should become the central focus of modeling. Finally, we suggest that this shift in perspective would imply changing current mainstream design approaches, which are mainly focused on functional aspects of the human-robot interaction, to the development of architectural frameworks that integrate the enabling dimensions of social cognition.

Gaggioli, A., Chirico, A., Di Lernia, D., Maggioni, M. A., Malighetti, C., Manzi, F., Marchetti, A., Massaro, D., Rea, F., Rossignoli, D., Sandini, G., Villani, D., Wiederhold, B. K., Riva, G., Sciutti, A., Machines like Us and People like You: Toward Human-Robot Shared Experience, <<CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING>>, 2021; 24 (5): 357-361. [doi:10.1089/cyber.2021.29216.aga] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/183290]

Machines like Us and People like You: Toward Human-Robot Shared Experience

Gaggioli, A.;Chirico, A.;Di Lernia, D.;Maggioni, M. A.;Malighetti, C.;Manzi, F.;Marchetti, A.;Massaro, D.;Rossignoli, D.;Villani, D.;Riva, G.;
2021

Abstract

In the past years, the field of collaborative robots has been developing fast, with applications ranging from health care to search and rescue, construction, entertainment, sports, and many others. However, current social robotics is still far from the general abilities we expect in a robot collaborator. This limitation is more evident when robots are faced with real-life contexts and activities occurring over long periods. In this article, we argue that human-robot collaboration is more than just being able to work side by side on complementary tasks: collaboration is a complex relational process that entails mutual understanding and reciprocal adaptation. Drawing on this assumption, we propose to shift the focus from "human-robot interaction"to "human-robot shared experience."We hold that for enabling the emergence of such shared experiential space between humans and robots, constructs such as coadaptation, intersubjectivity, individual differences, and identity should become the central focus of modeling. Finally, we suggest that this shift in perspective would imply changing current mainstream design approaches, which are mainly focused on functional aspects of the human-robot interaction, to the development of architectural frameworks that integrate the enabling dimensions of social cognition.
2021
Inglese
Gaggioli, A., Chirico, A., Di Lernia, D., Maggioni, M. A., Malighetti, C., Manzi, F., Marchetti, A., Massaro, D., Rea, F., Rossignoli, D., Sandini, G., Villani, D., Wiederhold, B. K., Riva, G., Sciutti, A., Machines like Us and People like You: Toward Human-Robot Shared Experience, <<CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING>>, 2021; 24 (5): 357-361. [doi:10.1089/cyber.2021.29216.aga] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/183290]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/183290
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact