A rapid AFB1 detection method by ELISA kit test was used on feedstuff samples, and compared to an HPLC method, to verify if the presence of clay-adsorbent (SA) could cause erroneous quantification of the toxin. Samples were obtained using two AFB1-contaminated feedstuffs (7.92 and 17.58 µg/kg for low and high contaminated feeds; LC and HC respectively), added either one of two commercial SAs (Atox® and Myco AD) and three different inclusion doses (0, 10 and 20 g/kg, respectively for CTR, 1% and 2% doses). The HPLC and ELISA data were compared in CTR samples with a paired t-test. The AFB1 recoveries, performed with ELISA, were analysed as a completely randomized design using a 2×2×3 factorial arrangement. The ELISA method tended to underestimate the AFB1 concentrations with respect to the HPLC method, both in HC (P=0.050) and in LC (P<0.001) feedstuffs. A more drastic reduction (P<0.001) was observed when SAs were included in the two feedstuffs. In particular, Atox® determined an AFB1 recovery of 15,5% in HC and 7,6% in LC (1% dose) and of 11,1% in HC and 8,4% in LC (2% dose).

Gallo, A., Moschini, M., Battaglia, M., Vilas Boas, M., Masoero, F., Effect of the presence of two commercial adsorbents in animal feed on aflatoxin B1 detrmination by ELISA kit test., Abstract de <<Proceedings of the 18th ASPA Congress>>, (Palermo, 09-12 June 2009 ), <<ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE>>, 2009; 8 (8 (suppl 2)): 304-306. 10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.304 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/12292]

Effect of the presence of two commercial adsorbents in animal feed on aflatoxin B1 detrmination by ELISA kit test.

Gallo, Antonio;Moschini, Maurizio;Battaglia, Marco;Masoero, Francesco
2009

Abstract

A rapid AFB1 detection method by ELISA kit test was used on feedstuff samples, and compared to an HPLC method, to verify if the presence of clay-adsorbent (SA) could cause erroneous quantification of the toxin. Samples were obtained using two AFB1-contaminated feedstuffs (7.92 and 17.58 µg/kg for low and high contaminated feeds; LC and HC respectively), added either one of two commercial SAs (Atox® and Myco AD) and three different inclusion doses (0, 10 and 20 g/kg, respectively for CTR, 1% and 2% doses). The HPLC and ELISA data were compared in CTR samples with a paired t-test. The AFB1 recoveries, performed with ELISA, were analysed as a completely randomized design using a 2×2×3 factorial arrangement. The ELISA method tended to underestimate the AFB1 concentrations with respect to the HPLC method, both in HC (P=0.050) and in LC (P<0.001) feedstuffs. A more drastic reduction (P<0.001) was observed when SAs were included in the two feedstuffs. In particular, Atox® determined an AFB1 recovery of 15,5% in HC and 7,6% in LC (1% dose) and of 11,1% in HC and 8,4% in LC (2% dose).
2009
Inglese
Gallo, A., Moschini, M., Battaglia, M., Vilas Boas, M., Masoero, F., Effect of the presence of two commercial adsorbents in animal feed on aflatoxin B1 detrmination by ELISA kit test., Abstract de <<Proceedings of the 18th ASPA Congress>>, (Palermo, 09-12 June 2009 ), <<ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE>>, 2009; 8 (8 (suppl 2)): 304-306. 10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.304 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/12292]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/12292
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact