Background and AimsClimate change poses increasing issues to the rapid and successful establishment of new vineyards. In this study, conducted over two consecutive seasons on potted vines, we evaluated the effects of a synthetic potassium polyacrylate hydrogel (WS-SH) and an organic-based hydrogel (WS-OH), both applied at transplanting, on vine water status, productivity, and fruit and wine composition, under progressive water deficit. These treatments were compared with a water-stressed control (WS-C) and a fully irrigated reference (WW-C).Methods and ResultsIn both years, WS-SH and WS-OH treatments delayed the decline in predawn water potential by several days and improved leaf gas exchange under limited irrigation. This led to increased leaf area and overall vine vigor. By the end of the second year, WS-OH had greater root system development compared to all other water-stressed treatments (+17% than WS-C), while WS-SH favored dry matter allocation toward aboveground organs (+17.6%). As a result, both WS-SH and WS-OH vines maintained yields comparable to WW-C, whereas WS-C showed a 33% yield reduction. Due to higher crop loads, WS-SH and WS-OH vines had lower leaf-to-fruit ratios than WS-C (-0.116 m2/kg and -0.147 m2/kg, respectively), resulting in reduced grape sugar content (-1.8 and -1.6 degrees Brix, respectively), anthocyanins (-48% and -51%, respectively), and phenolics (-21% and -23%, respectively). Wines produced at the end of the second season reflected this composition, showing significantly lower alcohol content (-1.11% v/v and -1.05% v/v, respectively), phenolic levels, and chromatic traits.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that hydrogels applied at transplanting can enhance vine tolerance to water stress and increase yield in the first productive season, in exchange for a reduction in sugar and anthocyanin contents in grapes.Significance of the StudyHydrogels could represent valuable tools to increase vineyard tolerance to summer stresses after transplanting. No substantial differences were observed between the effects of the synthetic and organic hydrogels, highlighting the potential of organic formulations as a sustainable and effective strategy to improve vineyard resilience to summer drought conditions. These results should be confirmed under operational conditions through field experiments.

Frioni, T., Tiwari, H., Bonicelli, P. G., Poni, S., D'Intino, L., Gabrielli, M., Effects of New Synthetic and Organic Hydrogel Soil Application on Physiology, Fruit Composition, and Wine Quality of Water-Stressed Potted Grapevines, <<AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH>>, 2026; 2026 (1): 1-14. [doi:10.1155/ajgw/1177838] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336918]

Effects of New Synthetic and Organic Hydrogel Soil Application on Physiology, Fruit Composition, and Wine Quality of Water-Stressed Potted Grapevines

Frioni, Tommaso
;
Tiwari, Harsh;Bonicelli, Pier Giorgio;Poni, Stefano;D'Intino, Leonardo;Gabrielli, Mario
2026

Abstract

Background and AimsClimate change poses increasing issues to the rapid and successful establishment of new vineyards. In this study, conducted over two consecutive seasons on potted vines, we evaluated the effects of a synthetic potassium polyacrylate hydrogel (WS-SH) and an organic-based hydrogel (WS-OH), both applied at transplanting, on vine water status, productivity, and fruit and wine composition, under progressive water deficit. These treatments were compared with a water-stressed control (WS-C) and a fully irrigated reference (WW-C).Methods and ResultsIn both years, WS-SH and WS-OH treatments delayed the decline in predawn water potential by several days and improved leaf gas exchange under limited irrigation. This led to increased leaf area and overall vine vigor. By the end of the second year, WS-OH had greater root system development compared to all other water-stressed treatments (+17% than WS-C), while WS-SH favored dry matter allocation toward aboveground organs (+17.6%). As a result, both WS-SH and WS-OH vines maintained yields comparable to WW-C, whereas WS-C showed a 33% yield reduction. Due to higher crop loads, WS-SH and WS-OH vines had lower leaf-to-fruit ratios than WS-C (-0.116 m2/kg and -0.147 m2/kg, respectively), resulting in reduced grape sugar content (-1.8 and -1.6 degrees Brix, respectively), anthocyanins (-48% and -51%, respectively), and phenolics (-21% and -23%, respectively). Wines produced at the end of the second season reflected this composition, showing significantly lower alcohol content (-1.11% v/v and -1.05% v/v, respectively), phenolic levels, and chromatic traits.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that hydrogels applied at transplanting can enhance vine tolerance to water stress and increase yield in the first productive season, in exchange for a reduction in sugar and anthocyanin contents in grapes.Significance of the StudyHydrogels could represent valuable tools to increase vineyard tolerance to summer stresses after transplanting. No substantial differences were observed between the effects of the synthetic and organic hydrogels, highlighting the potential of organic formulations as a sustainable and effective strategy to improve vineyard resilience to summer drought conditions. These results should be confirmed under operational conditions through field experiments.
2026
Inglese
Frioni, T., Tiwari, H., Bonicelli, P. G., Poni, S., D'Intino, L., Gabrielli, M., Effects of New Synthetic and Organic Hydrogel Soil Application on Physiology, Fruit Composition, and Wine Quality of Water-Stressed Potted Grapevines, <<AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH>>, 2026; 2026 (1): 1-14. [doi:10.1155/ajgw/1177838] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336918]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ajgwr Hydrogels.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 504.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
504.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336918
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact