There are numerous conditions and ways through which rigidity can manifest in people’s reasoning. Our review aims to focus on the construct of socio-cognitive polarization, which encompasses both cognitive and social rigidity and its relationship with performance measures of cognitive rigidity as problem-solving. Here we will synthesize a recent wave of research suggesting that susceptibility to extreme political ideology is sculpted by an individual’s cognitively-rooted reasoning architecture that goes above and beyond voting decisions. Foremost we highlight a novel approach to measuring flexibility using content-free problem-solving tasks in contrast to self-report measures and qualitative questionnaires. Further, the results of a series of studies conducted in the last years suggest that the boundaries of rigidity extend well beyond voting decisions to include aspects of rigidity such as conservatism and xenophobia.
Iannello, P., Cancer, A., Antonietti, A., Salvi, C., Navigating the pandemic emergency: The role of socio-cognitive polarization in complex situations|ORIENTARSI DURANTE L’EMERGENZA PANDEMICA Il ruolo della polarizzazione socio-cognitiva nelle situazioni complesse, <<SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI>>, 2024; 36 (2): 433-451. [doi:10.1422/113330] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/288796]
Navigating the pandemic emergency: The role of socio-cognitive polarization in complex situations|ORIENTARSI DURANTE L’EMERGENZA PANDEMICA Il ruolo della polarizzazione socio-cognitiva nelle situazioni complesse
Iannello, Paola;Cancer, Alice;Antonietti, Alessandro;
2024
Abstract
There are numerous conditions and ways through which rigidity can manifest in people’s reasoning. Our review aims to focus on the construct of socio-cognitive polarization, which encompasses both cognitive and social rigidity and its relationship with performance measures of cognitive rigidity as problem-solving. Here we will synthesize a recent wave of research suggesting that susceptibility to extreme political ideology is sculpted by an individual’s cognitively-rooted reasoning architecture that goes above and beyond voting decisions. Foremost we highlight a novel approach to measuring flexibility using content-free problem-solving tasks in contrast to self-report measures and qualitative questionnaires. Further, the results of a series of studies conducted in the last years suggest that the boundaries of rigidity extend well beyond voting decisions to include aspects of rigidity such as conservatism and xenophobia.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.