: This article investigates the attribution of mental state (AMS) to an anthropomorphic robot by humans in a strategic interaction. We conducted an experiment in which human subjects are paired with either a human or an anthropomorphic robot to play an iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game, and we tested whether AMS is dependent on the robot "consistency," that is, the correspondence between the robot's verbal reaction and its behavior after a nonoptimal social outcome of the game is obtained. We find that human partners are attributed a higher mental state level than robotic partners, regardless of the partner's consistency between words and actions. Conversely, the level of AMS assigned to the robot is significantly higher when the robot is consistent in its words and actions. This finding is robust to the inclusion of psychological factors such as risk attitude and trust, and it holds regardless of subjects' initial beliefs about the adaptability of the robot. Finally, we find that when the robot apologizes for its behavior and defects in the following stage, the epistemic component of the AMS significantly increases.

Rossignoli, D., Manzi, F., Gaggioli, A., Marchetti, A., Massaro, D., Riva, G., Maggioni, M. A., The Importance of Being Consistent: Attribution of Mental States in Strategic Human–Robot Interactions, <<CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING>>, 2024; (NA): N/AA-N/A. [doi:10.1089/cyber.2023.0353] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/278576]

The Importance of Being Consistent: Attribution of Mental States in Strategic Human–Robot Interactions

Rossignoli, Domenico;Manzi, Federico;Gaggioli, Andrea;Marchetti, Antonella;Massaro, Davide;Riva, Giuseppe;Maggioni, Mario Agostino
2024

Abstract

: This article investigates the attribution of mental state (AMS) to an anthropomorphic robot by humans in a strategic interaction. We conducted an experiment in which human subjects are paired with either a human or an anthropomorphic robot to play an iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game, and we tested whether AMS is dependent on the robot "consistency," that is, the correspondence between the robot's verbal reaction and its behavior after a nonoptimal social outcome of the game is obtained. We find that human partners are attributed a higher mental state level than robotic partners, regardless of the partner's consistency between words and actions. Conversely, the level of AMS assigned to the robot is significantly higher when the robot is consistent in its words and actions. This finding is robust to the inclusion of psychological factors such as risk attitude and trust, and it holds regardless of subjects' initial beliefs about the adaptability of the robot. Finally, we find that when the robot apologizes for its behavior and defects in the following stage, the epistemic component of the AMS significantly increases.
2024
Inglese
Rossignoli, D., Manzi, F., Gaggioli, A., Marchetti, A., Massaro, D., Riva, G., Maggioni, M. A., The Importance of Being Consistent: Attribution of Mental States in Strategic Human–Robot Interactions, <<CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING>>, 2024; (NA): N/AA-N/A. [doi:10.1089/cyber.2023.0353] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/278576]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/278576
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact