The present review aims to map the current literature on educational interventions to promote food literacy in type 2 diabetes, with a particular focus on the concept of patient engagement. The systematic review was implemented on five databases with no restrictions on the publication year. The studies selected for the review were focused on patients with type 2 diabetes, ranging from 2003 to 2021 and published in 13 countries (44% USA). Thirty-three articles were analyzed. Twenty-seven articles targeted singular patients; fifteen articles conceptualized patient engagement as self-management. In seven articles, the provider is a multidisciplinary team. Twenty articles did not report a theoretical framework in the intervention development, and eleven did not use an intervention material. Twenty-six articles did not use a technology proxy. Outcome categories were narratively mapped into four areas: clinical, psychological, behavioral, and literacy. To date, most of the interventions are heterogeneous in the adopted methodology, measures, and outcomes considered. More attention should be given to the psychosocial characterization of patient engagement as well as the technological support. High-quality, randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies are lacking and need to be conducted to verify the efficacy of these insights.

Savarese, M., Sapienza, M., Acquati, G. M., Nurchis, M. C., Riccardi, M. T., Mastrilli, V., D'Elia, R., Graps, E. A., Graffigna, G., Damiani, G., Educational interventions for promoting food literacy and patient engagement in preventing complications of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review, <<JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE>>, 2021; 11 (8): 795-N/A. [doi:10.3390/jpm11080795] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/203214]

Educational interventions for promoting food literacy and patient engagement in preventing complications of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review

Savarese, Mariarosaria;Sapienza, Martina;Nurchis, Mario Cesare;Riccardi, Maria Teresa;Graffigna, Guendalina;Damiani, Gianfranco
2021

Abstract

The present review aims to map the current literature on educational interventions to promote food literacy in type 2 diabetes, with a particular focus on the concept of patient engagement. The systematic review was implemented on five databases with no restrictions on the publication year. The studies selected for the review were focused on patients with type 2 diabetes, ranging from 2003 to 2021 and published in 13 countries (44% USA). Thirty-three articles were analyzed. Twenty-seven articles targeted singular patients; fifteen articles conceptualized patient engagement as self-management. In seven articles, the provider is a multidisciplinary team. Twenty articles did not report a theoretical framework in the intervention development, and eleven did not use an intervention material. Twenty-six articles did not use a technology proxy. Outcome categories were narratively mapped into four areas: clinical, psychological, behavioral, and literacy. To date, most of the interventions are heterogeneous in the adopted methodology, measures, and outcomes considered. More attention should be given to the psychosocial characterization of patient engagement as well as the technological support. High-quality, randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies are lacking and need to be conducted to verify the efficacy of these insights.
2021
Inglese
Savarese, M., Sapienza, M., Acquati, G. M., Nurchis, M. C., Riccardi, M. T., Mastrilli, V., D'Elia, R., Graps, E. A., Graffigna, G., Damiani, G., Educational interventions for promoting food literacy and patient engagement in preventing complications of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review, <<JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE>>, 2021; 11 (8): 795-N/A. [doi:10.3390/jpm11080795] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/203214]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/203214
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact