IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishA four-year field trial (2004-2007) was carried out to compare performances of organic and conventional farming systems in the Po Valley, at Montanaso Lombardo (LO, Northern Italy). The soil was a fine loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Ultic Haplustalf. Four vegetable crops were grown in the sequence: 2004 – processing tomato; 2005 – bean followed by savoy cabbage; 2006 – processing tomato; and 2007 – zucchini. The experimental design was a split-plot with four replicates, the management system being the main factor (OF, organic farming vs. CF, conventional farming) with the rate of nitrogen fertilisation as the secondary factor (0 vs. 60-200 kg N ha-1 year-1 depending on the vegetable crop). In all four of the years studied, the two farming systems did not show significant differences in marketable yields for any vegetable crops. The tomato fruit quality was also quite similar between the two farming methods. The choice of a well-adapted genotype is one of the keys to success in organic vegetable growing.
Tabaglio, V., Gavazzi, C., Nervo, G., A comparison of organically and conventionally grown vegetable crops: results from a 4-year field experiment, Paper, in Cultivating the Future based on Science, (Modena, Italy, 18-20 June 2008), International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), Modena 2008: 328-331 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/8737]
| Autori: | |
| Titolo: | A comparison of organically and conventionally grown vegetable crops: results from a 4-year field experiment |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2008 |
| Abstract: | A four-year field trial (2004-2007) was carried out to compare performances of organic and conventional farming systems in the Po Valley, at Montanaso Lombardo (LO, Northern Italy). The soil was a fine loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Ultic Haplustalf. Four vegetable crops were grown in the sequence: 2004 – processing tomato; 2005 – bean followed by savoy cabbage; 2006 – processing tomato; and 2007 – zucchini. The experimental design was a split-plot with four replicates, the management system being the main factor (OF, organic farming vs. CF, conventional farming) with the rate of nitrogen fertilisation as the secondary factor (0 vs. 60-200 kg N ha-1 year-1 depending on the vegetable crop). In all four of the years studied, the two farming systems did not show significant differences in marketable yields for any vegetable crops. The tomato fruit quality was also quite similar between the two farming methods. The choice of a well-adapted genotype is one of the keys to success in organic vegetable growing. |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Titolo del libro: | Cultivating the Future based on Science |
| ISBN: | 978-3-03736-023-1 |
| Editore: | International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR) |
| Nome del convegno: | Second Scientific Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress "Cultivate the Future" |
| Luogo del convegno: | Modena, Italy |
| Data inizio evento: | 2008-06-18 |
| Data fine evento: | 2008-06-20 |
| Tipo di contributo: | Paper |
| Citazione: | Tabaglio, V., Gavazzi, C., Nervo, G., A comparison of organically and conventionally grown vegetable crops: results from a 4-year field experiment, Paper, in Cultivating the Future based on Science, (Modena, Italy, 18-20 June 2008), International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), Modena 2008: 328-331 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/8737] |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Paper, Selected paper, Contributed paper, Working paper, Poster, Poster paper, Comunicazione, Relazione (in volume) |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2021