This article (like the one which precedes it by Robert Solow “The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution”, BNL Quarterly Review, N.215, 2000, pp.349-381) originated as an entry for the Storia del XX Secolo, which however was never published. Italian version: “Critica della Teoria Neoclassica della Crescita e della Distribuzione”, in Moneta e Credito, 2000, N.210, pp.187-232.
Pasinetti, L. L., Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution, <<QUARTERLY REVIEW. BANCA NAZIONALE DEL LAVORO>>, 2000; (215): 383-431 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/81623]
Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution
Pasinetti, Luigi LodovicoPrimo
2000
Abstract
This article (like the one which precedes it by Robert Solow “The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution”, BNL Quarterly Review, N.215, 2000, pp.349-381) originated as an entry for the Storia del XX Secolo, which however was never published. Italian version: “Critica della Teoria Neoclassica della Crescita e della Distribuzione”, in Moneta e Credito, 2000, N.210, pp.187-232.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.