Objectives The aim of this observational case-control study was to compare the oral health (OH) status of Bone metastatic cancer (BMC) patients (case Group 1), head and neck cancer HNC patients (case Group 2) and systemically healthy patients (control group). The secondary objective was to identify any risk factors associated with poor OH status. Methods This study was conducted from 2018-2024, and all patients were evaluated at the Oral Medicine, Head and Neck Department-Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCSS, Rome. The OH status was clinically and radiographically evaluated using the DMFT index, a full periodontal chart and a radiological examination (orthopantomography). The OH status was defined as "poor" in patients with stage III or IV periodontitis and/or a DMFT score >= 13. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universit & agrave; Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (ID-5746). Univariate statistical analysis was performed to detect associations between different clinical variables and OH. The associated variables were subjected to multivariate logistic regression to retrieve the independent risk factors for poor OH. Results A total of 510 (170 per group) patients were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that HNC patients showed significantly worse oral conditions when compared to BMC patients and controls. HNC patients showed an OR of 2.36 (95% CI: 1.35-4.13, p = 0.003) for poor OH when compared to control group. No differences were found between BMC patients and control group. Smoking habits (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.93-5.35, p < 0.0001), and age > 70 years (OR: 17.44, 95% CI: 8.78-34.66, p < 0.0001) were other significant risk factors for poor OH. The risk decreased for younger patients: for patients aged 60-69 years, the OR was 5.17 (95% CI: 2.74-9.75, p < 0.0001); for patients aged 50-59 years, it was 4.22 (95% CI: 2.30-7.76, p < 0.0001). Conclusions HNC patients exhibit significantly poorer OH than BMC patients and healthy controls, highlighting the need for enhanced dental care in oncologic management. Nevertheless, smoking habits and age remain important risk factors.

Rupe, C., Gioco, G., Tranfa, M., Scilla, F., Schiavelli, A., Cairo, F., Galli, J., Scambia, G., Rengo, C., Lajolo, C., Differences in oral health status between cancer patients: a case–control observational study, <<BMC ORAL HEALTH>>, 2025; 25 (1): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06963-7] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336116]

Differences in oral health status between cancer patients: a case–control observational study

Rupe, Cosimo;Gioco, Gioele;Tranfa, Mariateresa;Scilla, Francesco;Schiavelli, Anna;Galli, Jacopo;Scambia, Giovanni;Lajolo, Carlo
2025

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this observational case-control study was to compare the oral health (OH) status of Bone metastatic cancer (BMC) patients (case Group 1), head and neck cancer HNC patients (case Group 2) and systemically healthy patients (control group). The secondary objective was to identify any risk factors associated with poor OH status. Methods This study was conducted from 2018-2024, and all patients were evaluated at the Oral Medicine, Head and Neck Department-Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCSS, Rome. The OH status was clinically and radiographically evaluated using the DMFT index, a full periodontal chart and a radiological examination (orthopantomography). The OH status was defined as "poor" in patients with stage III or IV periodontitis and/or a DMFT score >= 13. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universit & agrave; Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (ID-5746). Univariate statistical analysis was performed to detect associations between different clinical variables and OH. The associated variables were subjected to multivariate logistic regression to retrieve the independent risk factors for poor OH. Results A total of 510 (170 per group) patients were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that HNC patients showed significantly worse oral conditions when compared to BMC patients and controls. HNC patients showed an OR of 2.36 (95% CI: 1.35-4.13, p = 0.003) for poor OH when compared to control group. No differences were found between BMC patients and control group. Smoking habits (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.93-5.35, p < 0.0001), and age > 70 years (OR: 17.44, 95% CI: 8.78-34.66, p < 0.0001) were other significant risk factors for poor OH. The risk decreased for younger patients: for patients aged 60-69 years, the OR was 5.17 (95% CI: 2.74-9.75, p < 0.0001); for patients aged 50-59 years, it was 4.22 (95% CI: 2.30-7.76, p < 0.0001). Conclusions HNC patients exhibit significantly poorer OH than BMC patients and healthy controls, highlighting the need for enhanced dental care in oncologic management. Nevertheless, smoking habits and age remain important risk factors.
2025
Inglese
Rupe, C., Gioco, G., Tranfa, M., Scilla, F., Schiavelli, A., Cairo, F., Galli, J., Scambia, G., Rengo, C., Lajolo, C., Differences in oral health status between cancer patients: a case–control observational study, <<BMC ORAL HEALTH>>, 2025; 25 (1): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06963-7] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336116]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream-101512626.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336116
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact