Background: Immunocompromised and clinically fragile individuals are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ), but vaccine uptake remains low due to organizational barriers and vaccine hesitancy (VH). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary hospital-based counseling model on attitudes toward the recombinant adjuvanted zoster vaccine (RZV). The primary objective was to assess changes in VH over time using the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale; secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with VH, evaluating vaccine safety, and monitoring post-vaccination HZ incidence. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a large research hospital in Rome, in collaboration with the Local Health Authority. Eligible patients were offered individualized counseling and administered two doses of the RZV. VH was assessed using the 12-item VAX scale at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between baseline characteristics and VH scores. Results: Between July 2022 and July 2023, 178 patients were enrolled, of whom 90 completed the one-year follow-up. Baseline VH was moderate (mean VAX: 2.291/6.000); higher scores were significantly associated with younger age, female sex, and rheumatologic disease (p < 0.05). After the intervention, VAX scores improved significantly across all subscales, particularly in trust in vaccine safety and benefits (p < 0.001). RZV was well tolerated; adverse events were mild and transient. Breakthrough HZ occurred in 3.33% of cases during follow-up. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary hospital-based model effectively improved vaccine attitudes and acceptance in fragile patients. Tracking VH over time with validated tools offers insights for scaling targeted interventions in high-risk groups.
Regazzi, L., Martinelli, S., Rizzo, F., Tamburrini, E., Salvo, P. F., Bosello, S. L., Landi, F., Sica, S., Spadea, A., Pascucci, D., Laurenti, P., Understanding Attitudes Toward Zoster Vaccination in the Hospital Setting: A Multidisciplinary Model to Contrast Vaccine Hesitancy in Fragile Patients—A Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study, <<VACCINES>>, 2025; 13 (8): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/vaccines13080843] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/320719]
Understanding Attitudes Toward Zoster Vaccination in the Hospital Setting: A Multidisciplinary Model to Contrast Vaccine Hesitancy in Fragile Patients—A Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study
Regazzi, Luca;Martinelli, Silvia;Rizzo, Federica;Tamburrini, Enrica;Salvo, Pierluigi Francesco;Bosello, Silvia Laura;Landi, Francesco;Sica, Simona;Pascucci, Domenico;Laurenti, Patrizia
2025
Abstract
Background: Immunocompromised and clinically fragile individuals are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ), but vaccine uptake remains low due to organizational barriers and vaccine hesitancy (VH). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary hospital-based counseling model on attitudes toward the recombinant adjuvanted zoster vaccine (RZV). The primary objective was to assess changes in VH over time using the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale; secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with VH, evaluating vaccine safety, and monitoring post-vaccination HZ incidence. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a large research hospital in Rome, in collaboration with the Local Health Authority. Eligible patients were offered individualized counseling and administered two doses of the RZV. VH was assessed using the 12-item VAX scale at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between baseline characteristics and VH scores. Results: Between July 2022 and July 2023, 178 patients were enrolled, of whom 90 completed the one-year follow-up. Baseline VH was moderate (mean VAX: 2.291/6.000); higher scores were significantly associated with younger age, female sex, and rheumatologic disease (p < 0.05). After the intervention, VAX scores improved significantly across all subscales, particularly in trust in vaccine safety and benefits (p < 0.001). RZV was well tolerated; adverse events were mild and transient. Breakthrough HZ occurred in 3.33% of cases during follow-up. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary hospital-based model effectively improved vaccine attitudes and acceptance in fragile patients. Tracking VH over time with validated tools offers insights for scaling targeted interventions in high-risk groups.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
vaccines-13-00843.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
829.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
829.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



