The present paper is situated within the burgeoning debates about Work and Organizational Psychology (WOP) as socially useful applied research. The paper focuses on the different research approaches marking the relationship between academics and practitioners. Recently, WOP critical perspectives have largely discussed the potential ideological assumptions underpinning theory building and research-conducting within the field. In parallel, there has been a surge of critical examinations of how contemporary WOP models can bridge the gap between research and practice and how these models can effectively contribute to social and individual needs. These issues highlight the unresolved epistemological and pragmatic questions underpinning the social utility of WOP research. In light of this debate, the paper aims to reflect on the tensions, contra dictions, and dilemmas that WOP scholars face in establishing and maintaining relationships with working contexts to engage in socially useful applied research
Colaiacovo, B., Petrilli, S., Bruno, A., Galuppo, L., Gilardi, S., Ripamonti, S. C., Benozzo, A., Corvino, C., Gorli, M., Vecchio, L. P., Converso, D., Tommasi, F., PERSPECTIVES ON THE SOCIAL UTILITY OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: A BIT OF THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE, <<LE TRAVAIL HUMAIN>>, 2025; 87 (4): 317-334 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/311568]
PERSPECTIVES ON THE SOCIAL UTILITY OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: A BIT OF THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE
Colaiacovo, BenedettaMembro del Collaboration Group
;Petrilli, SaraMembro del Collaboration Group
;Galuppo, LauraMembro del Collaboration Group
;Gilardi, SilviaMembro del Collaboration Group
;Ripamonti, Silvio Carlo;Corvino, ChiaraMembro del Collaboration Group
;Gorli, MaraMembro del Collaboration Group
;
2024
Abstract
The present paper is situated within the burgeoning debates about Work and Organizational Psychology (WOP) as socially useful applied research. The paper focuses on the different research approaches marking the relationship between academics and practitioners. Recently, WOP critical perspectives have largely discussed the potential ideological assumptions underpinning theory building and research-conducting within the field. In parallel, there has been a surge of critical examinations of how contemporary WOP models can bridge the gap between research and practice and how these models can effectively contribute to social and individual needs. These issues highlight the unresolved epistemological and pragmatic questions underpinning the social utility of WOP research. In light of this debate, the paper aims to reflect on the tensions, contra dictions, and dilemmas that WOP scholars face in establishing and maintaining relationships with working contexts to engage in socially useful applied researchI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.