Crucial arguments in the debate about the use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) as an intervention for children with neurodevelopmental disorders include, besides safety and efficacy issues, neuroethical concerns as well. No agreement has been reached yet in the clinical community about the ethical aspects of stimulating, although not invasively, a developing brain. To investigate ethical concerns about the use of tES in childhood and adolescence, we explored the knowledge and opinions of practitioners (psychologists, pediatricians, child psychiatrists, and rehabilitators) working in the field of rehabilitation of neurodevelopmental disorders (N=106). An online survey was designed to collect information about what practitioners in the neurodevelopmental field think about the therapeutic use of tES in terms of ethical concerns, need for facilitating conditions, openness to alternative treatments, and need for usability. Findings showed that a previous knowledge of tES, the presence of facilitating circumstances, and lower ethical concerns were the stronger predictors of clinical professionals' propensity to use tES for children rehabilitation. The present study is the first to explore the attitudes of clinical professionals toward the therapeutic use of tES in developmental populations, which we claim are useful for furthering the communication directed to the clinical community and its involvement in the discussion about tES-related issues.

Cancer, A., Santi, F., Antonietti, A., tES to rehabilitate neurodevelopmental disorders: A study on clinical practitioners' attitudes, in Cohen Kadosh, R. (ed.), Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam 2021: <<PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH>>, 343- 361. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.01.018 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/212787]

tES to rehabilitate neurodevelopmental disorders: A study on clinical practitioners' attitudes

Cancer, Alice;Antonietti, Alessandro
2021

Abstract

Crucial arguments in the debate about the use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) as an intervention for children with neurodevelopmental disorders include, besides safety and efficacy issues, neuroethical concerns as well. No agreement has been reached yet in the clinical community about the ethical aspects of stimulating, although not invasively, a developing brain. To investigate ethical concerns about the use of tES in childhood and adolescence, we explored the knowledge and opinions of practitioners (psychologists, pediatricians, child psychiatrists, and rehabilitators) working in the field of rehabilitation of neurodevelopmental disorders (N=106). An online survey was designed to collect information about what practitioners in the neurodevelopmental field think about the therapeutic use of tES in terms of ethical concerns, need for facilitating conditions, openness to alternative treatments, and need for usability. Findings showed that a previous knowledge of tES, the presence of facilitating circumstances, and lower ethical concerns were the stronger predictors of clinical professionals' propensity to use tES for children rehabilitation. The present study is the first to explore the attitudes of clinical professionals toward the therapeutic use of tES in developmental populations, which we claim are useful for furthering the communication directed to the clinical community and its involvement in the discussion about tES-related issues.
2021
Inglese
Progress in Brain Research
9780128223444
Elsevier B.V.
Cancer, A., Santi, F., Antonietti, A., tES to rehabilitate neurodevelopmental disorders: A study on clinical practitioners' attitudes, in Cohen Kadosh, R. (ed.), Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam 2021: <<PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH>>, 343- 361. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.01.018 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/212787]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/212787
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact