The recent attempts to remove from Italian law the ban of the contingency fee agreement between client and lawyer, culminated, after a few years, with the return to the previously abolished prohibition. This prompted a brief reflection on the reasons and scope of the ban in question, under the particular perspective of legal history, in order to better clarify what are the actual interests involved and what the possible solutions.
Isotton, R., «PER FAS ET NEFAS». SHORT HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE PACTUM DE QUOTA LITIS, <<ITALIAN REVIEW OF LEGAL HISTORY>>, 2017; 2017 (2/05): 1-14 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169143]
«PER FAS ET NEFAS». SHORT HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE PACTUM DE QUOTA LITIS
Isotton, Roberto
2017
Abstract
The recent attempts to remove from Italian law the ban of the contingency fee agreement between client and lawyer, culminated, after a few years, with the return to the previously abolished prohibition. This prompted a brief reflection on the reasons and scope of the ban in question, under the particular perspective of legal history, in order to better clarify what are the actual interests involved and what the possible solutions.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Per fas et nefas. Short historical notes on the pactum de quota litis.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
257.1 kB
Formato
Unknown
|
257.1 kB | Unknown | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
