The recent attempts to remove from Italian law the ban of the contingency fee agreement between client and lawyer, culminated, after a few years, with the return to the previously abolished prohibition. This prompted a brief reflection on the reasons and scope of the ban in question, under the particular perspective of legal history, in order to better clarify what are the actual interests involved and what the possible solutions.
Isotton, R., «PER FAS ET NEFAS». SHORT HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE PACTUM DE QUOTA LITIS, <<ITALIAN REVIEW OF LEGAL HISTORY>>, 2017; 2017 (2/05): 1-14 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169143]
Autori: | ||
Titolo: | «PER FAS ET NEFAS». SHORT HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE PACTUM DE QUOTA LITIS | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2017 | |
Abstract: | The recent attempts to remove from Italian law the ban of the contingency fee agreement between client and lawyer, culminated, after a few years, with the return to the previously abolished prohibition. This prompted a brief reflection on the reasons and scope of the ban in question, under the particular perspective of legal history, in order to better clarify what are the actual interests involved and what the possible solutions. | |
Lingua: | Inglese | |
Rivista: | ||
Citazione: | Isotton, R., «PER FAS ET NEFAS». SHORT HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE PACTUM DE QUOTA LITIS, <<ITALIAN REVIEW OF LEGAL HISTORY>>, 2017; 2017 (2/05): 1-14 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169143] | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Note | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per fas et nefas. Short historical notes on the pactum de quota litis.pdf | Versione Editoriale (PDF) | Nessuna Nota | Non specificato | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.