The relation between the right to receive and impart information (Article 10 ECHR) and the right to respect the private life of everyone (Article 8 ECHR) has often engaged the European Court of Human Rights. In 2012 the Grand Chamber better pointed the criteria which na- tional courts must assess in the decisions concerning which of the two rights should prevail, and applied a broad interpretation of the margin of appreciation principle. This article aims to determine whether the identified criteria are really useful, and to carry out a review on the application of the margin of appreciation so widely understood
Spatti, M., La Corte EDU sui conflitti fra libertà d’informazione e privacy. Tra criteri applicativi e margine di apprezzamento, <<DIRITTO PUBBLICO COMPARATO ED EUROPEO>>, 2020; 2020 (2): 363-384. [doi:10.17394/97518] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/157068]
La Corte EDU sui conflitti fra libertà d’informazione e privacy. Tra criteri applicativi e margine di apprezzamento
Spatti, Monica
2020
Abstract
The relation between the right to receive and impart information (Article 10 ECHR) and the right to respect the private life of everyone (Article 8 ECHR) has often engaged the European Court of Human Rights. In 2012 the Grand Chamber better pointed the criteria which na- tional courts must assess in the decisions concerning which of the two rights should prevail, and applied a broad interpretation of the margin of appreciation principle. This article aims to determine whether the identified criteria are really useful, and to carry out a review on the application of the margin of appreciation so widely understoodI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.