Antimicrobial stewardship programs are implemented to optimize the use of antibiotics and control the spread of antibiotic resistance. Many antimicrobial stewardship interventions have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics, the duration of antimicrobial therapy, and mortality. We evaluated the benefits of a combination of rapid diagnostic tests and an active re-evaluation of antibiotic therapy 72 h after the onset of bloodstream infection (BSI). All patients with BSI from November 2015 to November 2016 in a 1100-bed university hospital in Rome, where an Infectious Disease Consultancy Unit (Unità di Consulenza Infettivologica, UDCI) is available, were re-evaluated at the bedside 72 h after starting antimicrobial therapy and compared to two pre-intervention periods: the UDCI was called by the ward physician for patients with BSI and the UDCI was called directly by the microbiologist immediately after a pathogen was isolated from blood cultures. Recommendations for antibiotic de-escalation or discontinuation significantly increased (54%) from the two pre-intervention periods (32% and 27.2%, p < 0.0001). Appropriate escalation also significantly increased (22.5%) from the pre-intervention periods (8.1% and 8.2%, p < 0.0001). The total duration of antibiotic therapy decreased with intervention (from 21.9 days [standard deviation, SD 15.4] in period 1 to 19.3 days [SD 13.3] in period 2 to 17.7 days in period 3 [SD 11.5]; p = 0.002) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (from 29.7 days [SD 29.3] in period 1 to 26.8 days [SD 24.7] in period 2 to 24.2 days in period 3 [SD 20.7]; p = 0.04) than in the two pre-intervention periods. Mortality was similar among the study periods (31 patients died in period 1 (15.7%), 39 (16.7%) in period 2, and 48 (15.3%) in period 3; p = 0.90). Rapid diagnostic tests and 72 h re-evaluation of empirical therapy for BSI significantly correlated with an improved rate of optimal antibiotic therapy and decreased duration of antibiotic therapy and length of stay.

Murri, R., Taccari, F., Spanu Pennestri, T., D'Inzeo, T., Mastrorosa, I., Giovannenze, F., Scoppettuolo, G., Ventura, G., Palazzolo, C., Camici, M., Lardo, S., Fiori, B., Sanguinetti, M., Cauda, R., Fantoni, M., A 72-h intervention for improvement of the rate of optimal antibiotic therapy in patients with bloodstream infections, <<EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES>>, 2018; 37 (1): 167-173. [doi:10.1007/s10096-017-3117-2] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/109770]

A 72-h intervention for improvement of the rate of optimal antibiotic therapy in patients with bloodstream infections

Murri, Rita
Primo
;
Spanu Pennestri, Teresa;D'Inzeo, Tiziana;Mastrorosa, Ilaria;Giovannenze, Francesca;Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo;Ventura, Giulio;Palazzolo, Claudia;Camici, Marta;Lardo, Sara;Fiori, Barbara;Sanguinetti, Maurizio;Cauda, Roberto;Fantoni, Massimo
2017

Abstract

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are implemented to optimize the use of antibiotics and control the spread of antibiotic resistance. Many antimicrobial stewardship interventions have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics, the duration of antimicrobial therapy, and mortality. We evaluated the benefits of a combination of rapid diagnostic tests and an active re-evaluation of antibiotic therapy 72 h after the onset of bloodstream infection (BSI). All patients with BSI from November 2015 to November 2016 in a 1100-bed university hospital in Rome, where an Infectious Disease Consultancy Unit (Unità di Consulenza Infettivologica, UDCI) is available, were re-evaluated at the bedside 72 h after starting antimicrobial therapy and compared to two pre-intervention periods: the UDCI was called by the ward physician for patients with BSI and the UDCI was called directly by the microbiologist immediately after a pathogen was isolated from blood cultures. Recommendations for antibiotic de-escalation or discontinuation significantly increased (54%) from the two pre-intervention periods (32% and 27.2%, p < 0.0001). Appropriate escalation also significantly increased (22.5%) from the pre-intervention periods (8.1% and 8.2%, p < 0.0001). The total duration of antibiotic therapy decreased with intervention (from 21.9 days [standard deviation, SD 15.4] in period 1 to 19.3 days [SD 13.3] in period 2 to 17.7 days in period 3 [SD 11.5]; p = 0.002) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (from 29.7 days [SD 29.3] in period 1 to 26.8 days [SD 24.7] in period 2 to 24.2 days in period 3 [SD 20.7]; p = 0.04) than in the two pre-intervention periods. Mortality was similar among the study periods (31 patients died in period 1 (15.7%), 39 (16.7%) in period 2, and 48 (15.3%) in period 3; p = 0.90). Rapid diagnostic tests and 72 h re-evaluation of empirical therapy for BSI significantly correlated with an improved rate of optimal antibiotic therapy and decreased duration of antibiotic therapy and length of stay.
2017
Inglese
Murri, R., Taccari, F., Spanu Pennestri, T., D'Inzeo, T., Mastrorosa, I., Giovannenze, F., Scoppettuolo, G., Ventura, G., Palazzolo, C., Camici, M., Lardo, S., Fiori, B., Sanguinetti, M., Cauda, R., Fantoni, M., A 72-h intervention for improvement of the rate of optimal antibiotic therapy in patients with bloodstream infections, <<EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES>>, 2018; 37 (1): 167-173. [doi:10.1007/s10096-017-3117-2] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/109770]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/109770
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact