IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishA survey of recent rulings by the Italian Constitutional Court on social rights, particularly regarding their coexistence with budget constraints, allows to formulate three general remarks: this case law is still centered around the notion of legislative discretion; consequently, not even in a difficult time of crisis has the Court adopted a rigid doctrine of financial rigor, nor have social rights ever been fully subordinated to budgetary discipline, as some feared; nevertheless, it is possible to detect the symptoms of a more intense and realistic attention of the Court for the economic dimension of policy choices, as well as their judicial review, whose outcome has been occasionally very critical towards ill-pondered austerity measures. The Court’s case law emphasizes both political discretion
Massa, M., Discrezionalità, sostenibilità, responsabilità nella giurisprudenza costituzionale sui diritti sociali, <<QUADERNI COSTITUZIONALI>>, 2017; (1): 73-96 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/98754]
| Autori: | |
| Titolo: | Discrezionalità, sostenibilità, responsabilità nella giurisprudenza costituzionale sui diritti sociali |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2017 |
| Abstract: | A survey of recent rulings by the Italian Constitutional Court on social rights, particularly regarding their coexistence with budget constraints, allows to formulate three general remarks: this case law is still centered around the notion of legislative discretion; consequently, not even in a difficult time of crisis has the Court adopted a rigid doctrine of financial rigor, nor have social rights ever been fully subordinated to budgetary discipline, as some feared; nevertheless, it is possible to detect the symptoms of a more intense and realistic attention of the Court for the economic dimension of policy choices, as well as their judicial review, whose outcome has been occasionally very critical towards ill-pondered austerity measures. The Court’s case law emphasizes both political discretion |
| Lingua: | Italiano |
| Rivista: | |
| Citazione: | Massa, M., Discrezionalità, sostenibilità, responsabilità nella giurisprudenza costituzionale sui diritti sociali, <<QUADERNI COSTITUZIONALI>>, 2017; (1): 73-96 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/98754] |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2020