IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishBackground: Authorship and inventorship are the key attribution rights that contribute to a scientist’s reputation and professional achievement. This article discusses the concepts of coinventorship and coauthorship in the legal and sociological literature, as well as journals’ publication guidelines and technology transfer offices’ recommendations. It discusses also the relative importance of social and legal norms in the allocation of scientific credit. Method: This article revises critically the literature on inventorship and authorship in academic science and derives some policy implications on the institutional mechanisms allocating scientific credit. It reports and assesses the recent empirical evidence on the importance of social normsfor the attribution of inventorship and authorship in teams of scientists. Finally, it discusses those norms from a social welfare perspective. Result: The social norms that regulate the distribution of authorship and inventorship do not reflect exclusively the relative contribution of each team member but also the members’ relative seniority or status. In the case of inventorship, such social norms appear to be as important as the legal norms whose respect is often invoked by technology transfer officers. Conclusion: Authorship and inventorship appear to be obsolete because they do not capture the increasing division of labor and responsibility typical of contemporary scientific research teams. The informative value of both authorship and inventorship attributions may be much more limited than assumed by recent evaluation exercises.
Lissoni, F., Montobbio, F., Guest Authors or Ghost Inventors? Inventorship and Authorship Attribution in Academic Science, <<EVALUATION REVIEW>>, 2015; 39 (1): 19-45. [doi:10.1177/0193841X13517234] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/98545]
| Autori: | ||
| Titolo: | Guest Authors or Ghost Inventors? Inventorship and Authorship Attribution in Academic Science | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13517234 | |
| URL: | www.sageltd.co.uk/ | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2015 | |
| Abstract: | Background: Authorship and inventorship are the key attribution rights that contribute to a scientist’s reputation and professional achievement. This article discusses the concepts of coinventorship and coauthorship in the legal and sociological literature, as well as journals’ publication guidelines and technology transfer offices’ recommendations. It discusses also the relative importance of social and legal norms in the allocation of scientific credit. Method: This article revises critically the literature on inventorship and authorship in academic science and derives some policy implications on the institutional mechanisms allocating scientific credit. It reports and assesses the recent empirical evidence on the importance of social normsfor the attribution of inventorship and authorship in teams of scientists. Finally, it discusses those norms from a social welfare perspective. Result: The social norms that regulate the distribution of authorship and inventorship do not reflect exclusively the relative contribution of each team member but also the members’ relative seniority or status. In the case of inventorship, such social norms appear to be as important as the legal norms whose respect is often invoked by technology transfer officers. Conclusion: Authorship and inventorship appear to be obsolete because they do not capture the increasing division of labor and responsibility typical of contemporary scientific research teams. The informative value of both authorship and inventorship attributions may be much more limited than assumed by recent evaluation exercises. | |
| Lingua: | Inglese | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Citazione: | Lissoni, F., Montobbio, F., Guest Authors or Ghost Inventors? Inventorship and Authorship Attribution in Academic Science, <<EVALUATION REVIEW>>, 2015; 39 (1): 19-45. [doi:10.1177/0193841X13517234] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/98545] | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Note | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation ReviewOA.pdf | Articolo Principale | Postprint (versione finale dell’autore successiva alla peer-review) | Nessuna Nota | Non specificato | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |
Copyright © 2021