IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishThis paper assesses the depth of transparency in the banking industry and the impact of the recent financial crisis. We interpret transparency in terms of conservatism and timeliness, as in Ball, Kothari, and Robin (2000, p. 2). We use a sample of European listed banks over 2005–2011 and apply three models to proxy for conservatism (Ball, Kothari, & Nikolaev, 2013; Nichols, Wahlen, & Wieland, 2009; Ball & Shivakumar, 2005) and two metrics to gauge timeliness (Raonic, McLeay, & Asimakopoulos, 2004; Ball, et al., 2000). Our findings do not document the existence of conservatism during the first years of mandatory IFRS induction in the European banking industry. However, the levels of conservatism significantly increased after the crisis outbreak (higher timeliness of loan loss provisions, timelier “bad news” recognition and asymmetrically increased negative accruals). Moreover, timeliness significantly increased after the crisis outset. This evidence on combined conservatism and timeliness suggests an attempt of banks to increase transparency following the financial crisis burst to mitigate the adverse consequences of the opaqueness typically characterising the industry.
Manganaris, P., Beccalli, E., Dimitropoulos, P., Bank transparency and the crisis, <<THE BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW>>, 2017; 49 (2): 121-137. [doi:10.1016/j.bar.2016.07.002] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/97713]
| Autori: | ||
| Titolo: | Bank transparency and the crisis | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.07.002 | |
| URL: | http://www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/6/2/2/8/0/1/index.htt | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2017 | |
| Abstract: | This paper assesses the depth of transparency in the banking industry and the impact of the recent financial crisis. We interpret transparency in terms of conservatism and timeliness, as in Ball, Kothari, and Robin (2000, p. 2). We use a sample of European listed banks over 2005–2011 and apply three models to proxy for conservatism (Ball, Kothari, & Nikolaev, 2013; Nichols, Wahlen, & Wieland, 2009; Ball & Shivakumar, 2005) and two metrics to gauge timeliness (Raonic, McLeay, & Asimakopoulos, 2004; Ball, et al., 2000). Our findings do not document the existence of conservatism during the first years of mandatory IFRS induction in the European banking industry. However, the levels of conservatism significantly increased after the crisis outbreak (higher timeliness of loan loss provisions, timelier “bad news” recognition and asymmetrically increased negative accruals). Moreover, timeliness significantly increased after the crisis outset. This evidence on combined conservatism and timeliness suggests an attempt of banks to increase transparency following the financial crisis burst to mitigate the adverse consequences of the opaqueness typically characterising the industry. | |
| Lingua: | Inglese | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Citazione: | Manganaris, P., Beccalli, E., Dimitropoulos, P., Bank transparency and the crisis, <<THE BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW>>, 2017; 49 (2): 121-137. [doi:10.1016/j.bar.2016.07.002] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/97713] | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/10807/97713
Copyright © 2021