The Turkish principle of secularism (laiklik) has a paramount importance not only in the country’s constitutional system, but also in its external relations. For a long time, inside Turkey it was presented as a pillar of democracy against Islamic fundamentalism; outside, it was perceived as the instrument making the coexistence between Islam and democratic values possible and, as such, as a model for other Muslim countries. This traditional interpretation of secularism, as known, has been increasingly challenged by the AKP-led government, and the consequences of the changes in the understanding and application of the constitutional principle of laiklik are being debated. This paper aims to look into this issue from the perspective of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), by examining a number of decisions characterized by a specific interpretation of the Turkish principle of secularism, and by focusing on the evolution of the ECtHR’s understanding of the relation between laiklik and democracy in Turkey.

Bottoni, R., Turkish Democracy and the Evolving Interpretation of the Principle of Secularism: The European Court of Human Rights’ Perspective, <<BALKAN STUDIES>>, 2016; (51): 185-214 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/97654]

Turkish Democracy and the Evolving Interpretation of the Principle of Secularism: The European Court of Human Rights’ Perspective

Bottoni, Rossella
2016

Abstract

The Turkish principle of secularism (laiklik) has a paramount importance not only in the country’s constitutional system, but also in its external relations. For a long time, inside Turkey it was presented as a pillar of democracy against Islamic fundamentalism; outside, it was perceived as the instrument making the coexistence between Islam and democratic values possible and, as such, as a model for other Muslim countries. This traditional interpretation of secularism, as known, has been increasingly challenged by the AKP-led government, and the consequences of the changes in the understanding and application of the constitutional principle of laiklik are being debated. This paper aims to look into this issue from the perspective of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), by examining a number of decisions characterized by a specific interpretation of the Turkish principle of secularism, and by focusing on the evolution of the ECtHR’s understanding of the relation between laiklik and democracy in Turkey.
Inglese
Bottoni, R., Turkish Democracy and the Evolving Interpretation of the Principle of Secularism: The European Court of Human Rights’ Perspective, <<BALKAN STUDIES>>, 2016; (51): 185-214 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/97654]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/97654
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact