IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishIn two passages of book XIV Diodorus emphasizes the recognized hegemony exercised by Sparta both on land and sea after the Peloponnesian War (XIV 10 and 13). We have to put these places side to side with others: XIV 84 and 97, XV 23, XV, 60, XV 78-79, from which comes out a judgment of failure of the maritime hegemony as such: it takes its full value only if it is combined with that on earth. Unlike Xenophon, who still believed in the dual hegemony and in the division of spheres of influence between Sparta and Athens, Diodorus reflects a perspective which is not Athenian and which reopens the debate on the conditions for the exercise of Panhellenic hegemony. Diodorus probably draws this topic from an historiographical tradition interested in Boeotian hegemony.
Bearzot, C. S., L’impero del mare come egemonia subalterna nel IV secolo (Diodoro, libri XIV-XV), <<HISTORIKA>>, 2015; 5 (N/A): 287-298 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/96861]
| Autori: | ||
| Titolo: | L’impero del mare come egemonia subalterna nel IV secolo (Diodoro, libri XIV-XV) | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2016 | |
| Abstract: | In two passages of book XIV Diodorus emphasizes the recognized hegemony exercised by Sparta both on land and sea after the Peloponnesian War (XIV 10 and 13). We have to put these places side to side with others: XIV 84 and 97, XV 23, XV, 60, XV 78-79, from which comes out a judgment of failure of the maritime hegemony as such: it takes its full value only if it is combined with that on earth. Unlike Xenophon, who still believed in the dual hegemony and in the division of spheres of influence between Sparta and Athens, Diodorus reflects a perspective which is not Athenian and which reopens the debate on the conditions for the exercise of Panhellenic hegemony. Diodorus probably draws this topic from an historiographical tradition interested in Boeotian hegemony. | |
| Lingua: | Italiano | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Citazione: | Bearzot, C. S., L’impero del mare come egemonia subalterna nel IV secolo (Diodoro, libri XIV-XV), <<HISTORIKA>>, 2015; 5 (N/A): 287-298 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/96861] | |
| Altre informazioni significative: | Articolo già pubblicato in Aevum 89 (2015), 83-91. L'attuale uscita in "Historika" costituisce la pubblicazione degli Atti del Convegno internazionale di studi "Great Is the Power of the Sea. The Power of the Sea and Sea Power in the Greek World of the Archaic and Classical Periods", Olympia-Pyrgos, 25-30 maggio 2010. | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2021