In an important monograph dated 1979 (Foedus, ius Latii, civitas. Aspetti costituzionali della romanizzazione in Transpadana, Padova 1979) Giorgio Luraschi, innovating previous studies on the subject, argued that in Transpadana the granting of latinitas of 89 BC. after lex Pompeia de Transpadanis would not lead to any urban and architectural innovations nor to any land surveying rearrangements in rural areas, but only to the attribution of the title of colony to the preexisting urban realities. Hence the expression ‘fictional colonization’, which from that moment entered with full rights the jargon of ancient history and Roman public law studies. However some archaeological discoveries of recent years and especially the recent publication of a new form of rural land registry from Verona have shown that the granting of ius Latii did not fail to bring along some urban innovations among the Po valley’s .towns. Hence the need to revalue both the correctness and the limits of the expression ‘fictitious colonization’, now come into use.

Maganzani, L., 'Foedus, Ius Latii, Civitas': per una revisione del concetto di latinizzazione fittizia in Transpadana fra l'89 e il 49 a.C., <<JUS>>, 2016; 2016 (3): 2-31 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/90814]

'Foedus, Ius Latii, Civitas': per una revisione del concetto di latinizzazione fittizia in Transpadana fra l'89 e il 49 a.C.

Maganzani, Lauretta
Primo
2016

Abstract

In an important monograph dated 1979 (Foedus, ius Latii, civitas. Aspetti costituzionali della romanizzazione in Transpadana, Padova 1979) Giorgio Luraschi, innovating previous studies on the subject, argued that in Transpadana the granting of latinitas of 89 BC. after lex Pompeia de Transpadanis would not lead to any urban and architectural innovations nor to any land surveying rearrangements in rural areas, but only to the attribution of the title of colony to the preexisting urban realities. Hence the expression ‘fictional colonization’, which from that moment entered with full rights the jargon of ancient history and Roman public law studies. However some archaeological discoveries of recent years and especially the recent publication of a new form of rural land registry from Verona have shown that the granting of ius Latii did not fail to bring along some urban innovations among the Po valley’s .towns. Hence the need to revalue both the correctness and the limits of the expression ‘fictitious colonization’, now come into use.
2016
Italiano
JUS
Maganzani, L., 'Foedus, Ius Latii, Civitas': per una revisione del concetto di latinizzazione fittizia in Transpadana fra l'89 e il 49 a.C., <<JUS>>, 2016; 2016 (3): 2-31 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/90814]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jusonline_2016_3-389.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 2.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/90814
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact