OBJECTIVE: Electrical stimulation of the supraorbital trigeminal nerve branch induces trigeminocervical reflex responses (TCRs) in the neck muscles. The purpose of this study was to elicit more nociceptive TCR responses through preferential activation of the nociceptive afferents with a concentric surface electrode. METHODS: We recorded TCRs in 10 healthy subjects using both a standard (sTCR) and a nociceptive (nTCR) concentric surface electrode. We compared the baseline parameters, stimulus intensity/response, recovery, and habituation curves recorded for the two types of electrode, and assessed the effects of local anaesthesia. RESULTS: Compared with the sTCRs, nTCRs showed a significantly longer latency of the late reflex component, as well as lower pain and higher reflex thresholds. They also showed a different recovery cycle and stimulus intensity/response curve, but similar habituation rate. Local anaesthesia attenuated by 85% the late reflex response to stimulation by the concentric electrode, and by only 15% the response to standard electrode stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The differences observed stimulating with these two electrode types may be due to their different activation of the afferent fibres. SIGNIFICANCE: If this study were extended to patients affected by primary headaches, TCR monitoring could emerge as a sensitive tool for detecting changes in nociceptive transmission at the level of trigeminocervical complex. 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Serrao, M., Coppola, G., Di Lorenzo, C., Di Fabio, R., Padua, L., Sandrini, G., Pierelli, F., Nociceptive trigeminocervical reflexes in healthy subjects, <<CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY>>, 2010; 121 (9): 1563-1568 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/9063]

Nociceptive trigeminocervical reflexes in healthy subjects

Coppola, Giovanni;Padua, Luca;
2010

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electrical stimulation of the supraorbital trigeminal nerve branch induces trigeminocervical reflex responses (TCRs) in the neck muscles. The purpose of this study was to elicit more nociceptive TCR responses through preferential activation of the nociceptive afferents with a concentric surface electrode. METHODS: We recorded TCRs in 10 healthy subjects using both a standard (sTCR) and a nociceptive (nTCR) concentric surface electrode. We compared the baseline parameters, stimulus intensity/response, recovery, and habituation curves recorded for the two types of electrode, and assessed the effects of local anaesthesia. RESULTS: Compared with the sTCRs, nTCRs showed a significantly longer latency of the late reflex component, as well as lower pain and higher reflex thresholds. They also showed a different recovery cycle and stimulus intensity/response curve, but similar habituation rate. Local anaesthesia attenuated by 85% the late reflex response to stimulation by the concentric electrode, and by only 15% the response to standard electrode stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The differences observed stimulating with these two electrode types may be due to their different activation of the afferent fibres. SIGNIFICANCE: If this study were extended to patients affected by primary headaches, TCR monitoring could emerge as a sensitive tool for detecting changes in nociceptive transmission at the level of trigeminocervical complex. 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
2010
Italiano
Serrao, M., Coppola, G., Di Lorenzo, C., Di Fabio, R., Padua, L., Sandrini, G., Pierelli, F., Nociceptive trigeminocervical reflexes in healthy subjects, <<CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY>>, 2010; 121 (9): 1563-1568 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/9063]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/9063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact