IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishThe study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction.
Bigi, S. F. M., Labrie, N., Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care, in Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, (Lisbona, Portogallo, 09-12 June 2015), College Publications, London 2016: 251-265 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/89225]
| Autori: | |
| Titolo: | Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2016 |
| Abstract: | The study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction. |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Titolo del libro: | Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015 |
| ISBN: | 978-1-84890-212-1 |
| Editore: | College Publications |
| Nome del convegno: | 1st European Conference on Argumentation |
| Luogo del convegno: | Lisbona, Portogallo |
| Data inizio evento: | 2015-06-09 |
| Data fine evento: | 2015-06-12 |
| Citazione: | Bigi, S. F. M., Labrie, N., Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care, in Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, (Lisbona, Portogallo, 09-12 June 2015), College Publications, London 2016: 251-265 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/89225] |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Atti di Convegno, Congresso, Giornate di studio, ecc., Workshop (in volume) |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2020