The article is aimed at analyzing the narrative rhetoric of the film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (2007, di- rected by Julian Schnabel, written by Ronald Harwood). I begin by stressing the renewed interest for narrative rhetoric. This theoretical perspective has gained new strenght both in the field of film studies and in bioethics, where the representation of beginning and of end of life issues in films and television series is examined in order to evaluate its correctness. I continue by explaining the method of the analysis, which uses the tools of screenwriting theory. I highlight, thus, the argumentative nature of the classic narrative structure of a screenplay. The main passages in a plot, in fact, constitue the steps of a dialectal confrontation between a thematic thesis and a couterthematic antithesis. The theme of The Diving Bell and The Butterfly is expressed by the following statement: “The pain due to a total paralyses annihilates the dignity of human life”. The countertheme is expressed by an opposite statement: “The value of relationships makes life worthy even in the condition of an incurable illness”. The last part of the article is focused on the notion of “progressive rhetoric”. I identify the main traits of this category: the construcrive approach; the reframing of the idea of “limit”, which in this perspective is assumed as “opportunity” and not as “obstacle”; the respect for the opposite opinion; the ability of not being “preachy”; truthfulness.I conclude by arguing that the film in exam is a case of progressive rhetoric. In particular, I argue that, by an- ticipating the bioetically crucial decision of the character in the first part of the movie, the story can then unfold with a constructive and creative approach to the end of life issue.

L’articolo si propone un’analisi della retorica narrativa del film Lo scafandro e la farfalla (2007, diretto da Julian Schnabel, scritto da Ronald Harwood). Il contributo inizia sottolineando il rinnovato interesse per la retorica narrativa tanto negli studi sul cinema e la televisione, quanto nelle analisi che, in prospettiva bioetica, considerano la correttezza di come i problemi di ini- zio e fine vita sono raccontati nei film e nelle serie televisive. Il contributo procede illustrando il proprio approccio, quello della teoria della sceneggiatura. Lo schema clas- sico di costruzione di una trama è messo a fuoco nella sua valenza argomentativa. Gli snodi che lo costituisco- no, infatti, possono essere considerati come altrettanti passaggi di un confronto dialettico dove una tesi è appro- fondita nel confronto con una tesi opposta. Nel caso del film in questione, la tesi è: “la relazione con gli altri, la condivisione, rende la vita degna anche nella sofferenza”, la controtesi è: “una malattia paralizzante impedi- sce una vita degna”. L’articolo continua approfondendo la nozione di “retorica progressiva”, sottolineandone i tratti essenziali: im- postazione costruttiva; riconsiderazione del concetto di limite; dovuto approfondimento della tesi contraria; tono non predicatorio; rispetto del dato. Nelle conclusioni, si argomenta come il film in esame inveri tutti questi aspetti. In particolare, si argomenta che anticipata alla prima parte del film la scelta bioetica dirimente, la storia può poi svilupparsi in una direzione costruttiva e creativa, non polemica.

Braga, P., La dimensione argomentativa del racconto cinematografico in materia bioetica: il caso di Lo scafandro e la farfalla, <<MEDICINA E MORALE>>, 2016; (5): 603-631 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/88617]

La dimensione argomentativa del racconto cinematografico in materia bioetica: il caso di Lo scafandro e la farfalla

Braga, Paolo
2016

Abstract

The article is aimed at analyzing the narrative rhetoric of the film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (2007, di- rected by Julian Schnabel, written by Ronald Harwood). I begin by stressing the renewed interest for narrative rhetoric. This theoretical perspective has gained new strenght both in the field of film studies and in bioethics, where the representation of beginning and of end of life issues in films and television series is examined in order to evaluate its correctness. I continue by explaining the method of the analysis, which uses the tools of screenwriting theory. I highlight, thus, the argumentative nature of the classic narrative structure of a screenplay. The main passages in a plot, in fact, constitue the steps of a dialectal confrontation between a thematic thesis and a couterthematic antithesis. The theme of The Diving Bell and The Butterfly is expressed by the following statement: “The pain due to a total paralyses annihilates the dignity of human life”. The countertheme is expressed by an opposite statement: “The value of relationships makes life worthy even in the condition of an incurable illness”. The last part of the article is focused on the notion of “progressive rhetoric”. I identify the main traits of this category: the construcrive approach; the reframing of the idea of “limit”, which in this perspective is assumed as “opportunity” and not as “obstacle”; the respect for the opposite opinion; the ability of not being “preachy”; truthfulness.I conclude by arguing that the film in exam is a case of progressive rhetoric. In particular, I argue that, by an- ticipating the bioetically crucial decision of the character in the first part of the movie, the story can then unfold with a constructive and creative approach to the end of life issue.
2016
Italiano
Braga, P., La dimensione argomentativa del racconto cinematografico in materia bioetica: il caso di Lo scafandro e la farfalla, <<MEDICINA E MORALE>>, 2016; (5): 603-631 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/88617]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/88617
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact