IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishThe paper evaluates the differences between two currently leading annotation schemes for dependency treebanks. By relying on four treebanks, we demonstrate that the treatment of conjunctions and adpositions represents the core difference between the two schemes and that this impacts the topological properties of the linguistic networks induced from the treebanks. We also show that such properties are reflected in the performances of four probabilistic dependency parsers trained on the treebanks.
Passarotti, M. C., How Far Is Stanford from Prague (and vice versa)? Comparing Two Dependency-based Annotation Schemes by Network Analysis, <<L'ANALISI LINGUISTICA E LETTERARIA>>, 2016; (1): 21-46 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/84001]
| Autori: | ||
| Titolo: | How Far Is Stanford from Prague (and vice versa)? Comparing Two Dependency-based Annotation Schemes by Network Analysis | |
| Indirizzo URL alternativo: | http://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Marco_Passarotti-How-Far-Is-Stanford-from-Prague-and-vice-versa-ALL_1_2016.pdf | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2016 | |
| Abstract: | The paper evaluates the differences between two currently leading annotation schemes for dependency treebanks. By relying on four treebanks, we demonstrate that the treatment of conjunctions and adpositions represents the core difference between the two schemes and that this impacts the topological properties of the linguistic networks induced from the treebanks. We also show that such properties are reflected in the performances of four probabilistic dependency parsers trained on the treebanks. | |
| Lingua: | Inglese | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Citazione: | Passarotti, M. C., How Far Is Stanford from Prague (and vice versa)? Comparing Two Dependency-based Annotation Schemes by Network Analysis, <<L'ANALISI LINGUISTICA E LETTERARIA>>, 2016; (1): 21-46 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/84001] | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Note | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016_Passarotti_Analisi-Linguistica-Letteraria.pdf | Versione Editoriale (PDF) | Nessuna Nota |  | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |
Copyright © 2021