Based on a longitudinal eight-year study (2006e2014) in a large Italian food co-operative, this paper analyses whether and how the development and the use of sustainability control systems have been able to promote the integration of sustainability within organisational strategy. The co-operative has implemented three main instruments (sustainability report, sustainability annual plan and participatory social plan), which have been able to promote sustainability integration by inducing technical integration and reinforcing the cognitive enablers. However, strong cognitive (and organisational) barriers have gradually stifled the cognitive enablers and have not enabled sustainability to be fully integrated into the organisational strategy. As such, the integration process was marginalised, also due to the negative economic performance of the co-operative. The paper shows that sustainability integration remains a fragile concept even in a co-operative, despite the similarities between co-operative values and the principles of corporate social responsibility. Theoretically, the paper offers empirical evidences con-cerning management control literature for sustainability.

Battaglia, M., Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., Frey, M., Managing for integration: a longitudinal analysis of management control for sustainability, <<JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION>>, 2016; 136 (Part A): 213-225. [doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.108] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/76614]

Managing for integration: a longitudinal analysis of management control for sustainability

Passetti, Emilio
Secondo
;
2016

Abstract

Based on a longitudinal eight-year study (2006e2014) in a large Italian food co-operative, this paper analyses whether and how the development and the use of sustainability control systems have been able to promote the integration of sustainability within organisational strategy. The co-operative has implemented three main instruments (sustainability report, sustainability annual plan and participatory social plan), which have been able to promote sustainability integration by inducing technical integration and reinforcing the cognitive enablers. However, strong cognitive (and organisational) barriers have gradually stifled the cognitive enablers and have not enabled sustainability to be fully integrated into the organisational strategy. As such, the integration process was marginalised, also due to the negative economic performance of the co-operative. The paper shows that sustainability integration remains a fragile concept even in a co-operative, despite the similarities between co-operative values and the principles of corporate social responsibility. Theoretically, the paper offers empirical evidences con-cerning management control literature for sustainability.
2016
AREA13 - SCIENZE ECONOMICHE E STATISTICHE
Articolo su rivista presente in almeno un database (EconLit, MatScinet, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Publish or perish)
Inglese
Articolo in rivista
Inglese
Organisational strategy
Co-operative enterprise
Management control system
Sustainability control system
Social and environmental accounting
Settore SECS-P/07 - ECONOMIA AZIENDALE
Settore SECS-P/08 - ECONOMIA E GESTIONE DELLE IMPRESE
Elsevier
136
Part A
2016
213
225
13
Esperti anonimi
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Battaglia, M., Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., Frey, M., Managing for integration: a longitudinal analysis of management control for sustainability, <<JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION>>, 2016; 136 (Part A): 213-225. [doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.108] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/76614]
none
262
Battaglia, M; Passetti, Emilio; Bianchi, L; Frey, M.
4
art_per_29
03. Contributo in rivista::Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/76614
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 73
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact