To the Editor: We read with great interest Drs. Baldo and Pham’s observations1 concerning our article2 and specifically their final claim that in selecting alternative cephalosporins in cephalosporin allergic subjects, “similarities and differences between R1 groups need to be noted but failure to do likewise for the R2 groups may lead to serious consequences for the occasional patient”.

Romano, A., Gaeta, F., Valluzzi, R., Maggioletti, M., Zaffiro, A., Caruso, C., Quaratino, D., Reply, <<JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY>>, 2015; 136 (5): 1428-1428. [doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.053] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/72437]

Reply

Romano, Antonino;
2015

Abstract

To the Editor: We read with great interest Drs. Baldo and Pham’s observations1 concerning our article2 and specifically their final claim that in selecting alternative cephalosporins in cephalosporin allergic subjects, “similarities and differences between R1 groups need to be noted but failure to do likewise for the R2 groups may lead to serious consequences for the occasional patient”.
Inglese
Romano, A., Gaeta, F., Valluzzi, R., Maggioletti, M., Zaffiro, A., Caruso, C., Quaratino, D., Reply, <>, 2015; 136 (5): 1428-1428. [doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.053] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/72437]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/72437
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact