IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishSince its inceptions, the standard of best interest of the child was linked to decisions about suspend life-sustaining treatments in neonatal units and evaluation of treatments applied to children in terms of their quality of life. This origin has conditioned the interpretation of the standard from two extremes: a vitalistic one, and a non vitalistic interpretation that triumphed in Western bioethics and has led to the consecration of the standard of best interest of the child in the Convention on the Rights of the Child of United Nations. A detailed analysis reveals a simplistic, utilitarian and proportionalist standard, which change the basis of parenthood. We therefore believe that the standard of the best interest of the child is not the best for the child in neonatal intensive care units and especially not in the process of withhold or withdrawal life-sustaining treatments
Di Pietro, M. L., González Melado, F. J., The Best Interest of the Child in Neonatology: Is It Best for the Child?, <<CUADERNOS DE BIOÉTICA>>, 2015; 26 (87): 201-222 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71195]
| Autori: | |
| Titolo: | The Best Interest of the Child in Neonatology: Is It Best for the Child? |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2015 |
| Abstract: | Since its inceptions, the standard of best interest of the child was linked to decisions about suspend life-sustaining treatments in neonatal units and evaluation of treatments applied to children in terms of their quality of life. This origin has conditioned the interpretation of the standard from two extremes: a vitalistic one, and a non vitalistic interpretation that triumphed in Western bioethics and has led to the consecration of the standard of best interest of the child in the Convention on the Rights of the Child of United Nations. A detailed analysis reveals a simplistic, utilitarian and proportionalist standard, which change the basis of parenthood. We therefore believe that the standard of the best interest of the child is not the best for the child in neonatal intensive care units and especially not in the process of withhold or withdrawal life-sustaining treatments |
| Lingua: | Spagnolo |
| Rivista: | |
| Citazione: | Di Pietro, M. L., González Melado, F. J., The Best Interest of the Child in Neonatology: Is It Best for the Child?, <<CUADERNOS DE BIOÉTICA>>, 2015; 26 (87): 201-222 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71195] |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71195
Copyright © 2021