The contribution illustrates characteristics of Eduard Norden’s commentary on the sixth Book of Virgil’s Aeneid. Norden’s work is analyzed in terms of its genesis and relationship with analogous commentaries by Georg Kaibel on Sophocles’ Electra and by Richard Heinze on the third book of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Salient features of the commentary are discussed in their specific cultural context. Due importance is given to the influence of the method of August Boeckh and the teachings of Hermann Usener.

Galasso, L., Alcune osservazioni sul commento di Eduard Norden al libro VI dell'Eneide, <<EIKASMOS>>, 2015; 26 (N/A): 373-385 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71164]

Alcune osservazioni sul commento di Eduard Norden al libro VI dell'Eneide

Galasso
2015

Abstract

The contribution illustrates characteristics of Eduard Norden’s commentary on the sixth Book of Virgil’s Aeneid. Norden’s work is analyzed in terms of its genesis and relationship with analogous commentaries by Georg Kaibel on Sophocles’ Electra and by Richard Heinze on the third book of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Salient features of the commentary are discussed in their specific cultural context. Due importance is given to the influence of the method of August Boeckh and the teachings of Hermann Usener.
Italiano
Galasso, L., Alcune osservazioni sul commento di Eduard Norden al libro VI dell'Eneide, <<EIKASMOS>>, 2015; 26 (N/A): 373-385 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71164]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Eikasmos 26.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 1.17 MB
Formato Unknown
1.17 MB Unknown   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/71164
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact