The contribution illustrates characteristics of Eduard Norden’s commentary on the sixth Book of Virgil’s Aeneid. Norden’s work is analyzed in terms of its genesis and relationship with analogous commentaries by Georg Kaibel on Sophocles’ Electra and by Richard Heinze on the third book of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Salient features of the commentary are discussed in their specific cultural context. Due importance is given to the influence of the method of August Boeckh and the teachings of Hermann Usener.
Galasso, L., Alcune osservazioni sul commento di Eduard Norden al libro VI dell'Eneide, <<EIKASMOS>>, 2015; 26 (N/A): 373-385 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71164]
Alcune osservazioni sul commento di Eduard Norden al libro VI dell'Eneide
Galasso
2015
Abstract
The contribution illustrates characteristics of Eduard Norden’s commentary on the sixth Book of Virgil’s Aeneid. Norden’s work is analyzed in terms of its genesis and relationship with analogous commentaries by Georg Kaibel on Sophocles’ Electra and by Richard Heinze on the third book of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Salient features of the commentary are discussed in their specific cultural context. Due importance is given to the influence of the method of August Boeckh and the teachings of Hermann Usener.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eikasmos 26.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
1.17 MB
Formato
Unknown
|
1.17 MB | Unknown | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
