The Russian future tense has three semantic components (temporal, modal, and aspectual), which is why studies on this topic tend to emphasize an asymmetry within the Russian tense system. As a matter of fact, according to some linguists, there is one sole opposition in Russian: that between the past and present tenses. In the present work, the author expounds the attempts made by linguists to resolve this asymmetry, and distinguishes between Bondarko’s semantic functional formulation (1971) and the typological and contrastive studies which are peculiar to the Western linguistic tradition. She subsequently shows how the results of a typological-contrastive approach and the use of the conceptual apparatus developed so far within studies on modality and aspect, can help explain the semantic value of the future tense markers in Russian, particularly those of the present-future perfective aspect. In the part devoted to the analysis of a corpus of examples drawn from the Russian grammatical tradition, the future tense markers are considered as an amalgam and it is pointed out how their potential values are activated in precise communicative co-texts and contexts. This has led to a redefinition of the reciprocal relation among the semantic categories which are transmitted by the future (tense, aspect, and modality), underlining the rich polysemy of these verbal markers.

Bonola, A. P., Categorie semantico-funzionali del futuro russo, in Bonola, A. P., Cotta Ramusino, P., Goletjani, L. (ed.), Studi italiani di linguisti a slava. Strutture, uso e acquisizione, Firenze University Press, Firenze 2014: <<BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI SLAVISTICI>>, 13- 32 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/64355]

Categorie semantico-funzionali del futuro russo

Bonola, Anna Paola
2014

Abstract

The Russian future tense has three semantic components (temporal, modal, and aspectual), which is why studies on this topic tend to emphasize an asymmetry within the Russian tense system. As a matter of fact, according to some linguists, there is one sole opposition in Russian: that between the past and present tenses. In the present work, the author expounds the attempts made by linguists to resolve this asymmetry, and distinguishes between Bondarko’s semantic functional formulation (1971) and the typological and contrastive studies which are peculiar to the Western linguistic tradition. She subsequently shows how the results of a typological-contrastive approach and the use of the conceptual apparatus developed so far within studies on modality and aspect, can help explain the semantic value of the future tense markers in Russian, particularly those of the present-future perfective aspect. In the part devoted to the analysis of a corpus of examples drawn from the Russian grammatical tradition, the future tense markers are considered as an amalgam and it is pointed out how their potential values are activated in precise communicative co-texts and contexts. This has led to a redefinition of the reciprocal relation among the semantic categories which are transmitted by the future (tense, aspect, and modality), underlining the rich polysemy of these verbal markers.
2014
Italiano
Studi italiani di linguisti a slava. Strutture, uso e acquisizione
978-88-6655-655-8
Firenze University Press
Bonola, A. P., Categorie semantico-funzionali del futuro russo, in Bonola, A. P., Cotta Ramusino, P., Goletjani, L. (ed.), Studi italiani di linguisti a slava. Strutture, uso e acquisizione, Firenze University Press, Firenze 2014: <<BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI SLAVISTICI>>, 13- 32 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/64355]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/64355
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact