The author challenges the traditional assumption of derivational morphology which accords adverbial –ly derivational status and gives adverbs lexical category status on a par with nouns, verbs and adjectives. The author argues that adverbial –ly, unlike its adjectival counterpart, is inflectional and adverbs ending in –ly are rather to be regarded as inflected adjectives while those adverbs not containing –ly are uninflected adjectives; “adverbs cannot be categorially distinct from adjectives” (p. 342-343).
Piotti, S. R., Recensione a "Giegerich, H.J., The morphology of –ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. Cambridge University Press, UK 2012", <<L'ANALISI LINGUISTICA E LETTERARIA>>, 2013; (1):108-108 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/61151]
The morphology of –ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English.
Piotti, Sonia Rachele
2013
Abstract
The author challenges the traditional assumption of derivational morphology which accords adverbial –ly derivational status and gives adverbs lexical category status on a par with nouns, verbs and adjectives. The author argues that adverbial –ly, unlike its adjectival counterpart, is inflectional and adverbs ending in –ly are rather to be regarded as inflected adjectives while those adverbs not containing –ly are uninflected adjectives; “adverbs cannot be categorially distinct from adjectives” (p. 342-343).
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
