BACKGROUND: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. METHODS: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, conducted in the operating setting, 254 patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 18-65 years), undergoing minor surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were body mass index >35 kg/m(2), laryngeal or oesophageal varices, risk of aspiration or difficult face mask ventilation either referred or suspected (Langeron's criteria ≥2) and modified Mallampati classification score >2. Participants were randomly allocated to one of the two groups in which PLMA was inserted using DT (DT-group) or SC (SC-group). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test with Yates' correction, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student's t-test were carried-out as appropriate. RESULTS: The final insertion success rate was greater in SC-groupcompared with DT-group 90.1% (n = 109) versus 74.4% (n = 99) respectively (P = 0.002). Mean airway leak pressure was higher in SC-group compared to DT-group (23.7 ± 3.9 vs. 21.4 ± 3.2 respectively; (P = 0.001). There were no differences in insertion time, post-operative airway morbidity and complications. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that SC-technique improves the success rate of PLMA insertion by untrained physicians.

Perilli, V., Aceto, P., Sacco, T., Martella, N., Cazzato, M. T., Sollazzi, L., Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians, <<INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA>>, 2014; 58 (1): 25-29. [doi:10.4103/0019-5049.126784] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/61018]

Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians

Perilli, Valter;Aceto, Paola;Sacco, Teresa;Martella, Nunzia;Cazzato, Maria Teresa;Sollazzi, Liliana
2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. METHODS: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, conducted in the operating setting, 254 patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 18-65 years), undergoing minor surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were body mass index >35 kg/m(2), laryngeal or oesophageal varices, risk of aspiration or difficult face mask ventilation either referred or suspected (Langeron's criteria ≥2) and modified Mallampati classification score >2. Participants were randomly allocated to one of the two groups in which PLMA was inserted using DT (DT-group) or SC (SC-group). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test with Yates' correction, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student's t-test were carried-out as appropriate. RESULTS: The final insertion success rate was greater in SC-groupcompared with DT-group 90.1% (n = 109) versus 74.4% (n = 99) respectively (P = 0.002). Mean airway leak pressure was higher in SC-group compared to DT-group (23.7 ± 3.9 vs. 21.4 ± 3.2 respectively; (P = 0.001). There were no differences in insertion time, post-operative airway morbidity and complications. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that SC-technique improves the success rate of PLMA insertion by untrained physicians.
2014
Inglese
Perilli, V., Aceto, P., Sacco, T., Martella, N., Cazzato, M. T., Sollazzi, L., Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians, <<INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA>>, 2014; 58 (1): 25-29. [doi:10.4103/0019-5049.126784] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/61018]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/61018
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact