Anal fissure is a split in the lining of the distal anal canal. Lateral internal sphincterotomy remains the gold standard for treatment of anal fissure. Although technique is simple and effective, a drawback of this surgical procedure is its potential to cause minor but some times permanent alteration in rectal continence. Conservative approaches (such as topical application of ointment or botulinum toxin injections) have been proposed in order to treat this condition without any risk of permanent injury of the internal anal sphincter. These treatments are effective in a large number of patients. Furthermore, with the ready availability of medical therapies to induce healing of anal fissure, the risk of a first-line surgical approach is difficult to justify. The conservative treatments have a lower cost than surgery. Moreover, evaluation of the actual costs of each therapeutic option is important especially in times of economic crisis and downsizing of health spending.

Brisinda, G., Bianco, G., Silvestrini, N., Maria, G., Cost considerations in the treatment of anal fissures., <<EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH>>, 2014; 2014 (14): 511-525. [doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.924398] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/60909]

Cost considerations in the treatment of anal fissures.

Brisinda, Giuseppe;Bianco, Giuseppe;Silvestrini, Nicola;Maria, Giorgio
2014

Abstract

Anal fissure is a split in the lining of the distal anal canal. Lateral internal sphincterotomy remains the gold standard for treatment of anal fissure. Although technique is simple and effective, a drawback of this surgical procedure is its potential to cause minor but some times permanent alteration in rectal continence. Conservative approaches (such as topical application of ointment or botulinum toxin injections) have been proposed in order to treat this condition without any risk of permanent injury of the internal anal sphincter. These treatments are effective in a large number of patients. Furthermore, with the ready availability of medical therapies to induce healing of anal fissure, the risk of a first-line surgical approach is difficult to justify. The conservative treatments have a lower cost than surgery. Moreover, evaluation of the actual costs of each therapeutic option is important especially in times of economic crisis and downsizing of health spending.
Inglese
Brisinda, G., Bianco, G., Silvestrini, N., Maria, G., Cost considerations in the treatment of anal fissures., <<EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH>>, 2014; 2014 (14): 511-525. [doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.924398] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/60909]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/60909
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact