AIM: To compares the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS). To analyze early results of a single institution experience using adjuvant intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) presacral boost in locally advanced cancer. MATERIAL OF STUDY: 264 patients with curable colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic (97) or open colorectal resection (167). In 41 patients (31 open and 10 laparoscopic resection) with locally advanced rectal cancer we performed IORT. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of postoperative clinical and oncologic results. RESULTS: Twenty (21%) patients underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. The overall morbidity rates were 17.5% in the LS group and 20.9% in the OS group (P= 0.5). Average operative time was shorter in the OS than in the LS series (P= 0.01). Use of parenteral narcotics was shorter in LS than in OS group (P <0.001), but there were more stoma creations in LS group than in OS group (P= 0.001). All patients are alive at different followup periods. DISCUSSION: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death from malignancy in the industrialized world. The risk of local recurrence after treatment increases with tumor stage. The roles of radiochemotherapy and surgical procedures have been investigated extensively in the last decades, especially in locally advanced rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic techniques can be applied to colorectal malignancies without sacrificing oncologic results. Multimodality treatment with LS and IORT is safe and feasible

Brisinda, G., Vanella, S., Giustacchini, P., Cavicchioni, C., Crocco, A., Maria, G., Open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the era of multimodality treatment of cancer., <<ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA>>, 2013; 2013 (Dicembre): 563-570 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/60908]

Open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the era of multimodality treatment of cancer.

Brisinda, Giuseppe;Vanella, Serafino;Giustacchini, Piero;Cavicchioni, Camillo;Crocco, Anna;Maria, Giorgio
2013

Abstract

AIM: To compares the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS). To analyze early results of a single institution experience using adjuvant intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) presacral boost in locally advanced cancer. MATERIAL OF STUDY: 264 patients with curable colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic (97) or open colorectal resection (167). In 41 patients (31 open and 10 laparoscopic resection) with locally advanced rectal cancer we performed IORT. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of postoperative clinical and oncologic results. RESULTS: Twenty (21%) patients underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. The overall morbidity rates were 17.5% in the LS group and 20.9% in the OS group (P= 0.5). Average operative time was shorter in the OS than in the LS series (P= 0.01). Use of parenteral narcotics was shorter in LS than in OS group (P <0.001), but there were more stoma creations in LS group than in OS group (P= 0.001). All patients are alive at different followup periods. DISCUSSION: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death from malignancy in the industrialized world. The risk of local recurrence after treatment increases with tumor stage. The roles of radiochemotherapy and surgical procedures have been investigated extensively in the last decades, especially in locally advanced rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic techniques can be applied to colorectal malignancies without sacrificing oncologic results. Multimodality treatment with LS and IORT is safe and feasible
Inglese
Brisinda, G., Vanella, S., Giustacchini, P., Cavicchioni, C., Crocco, A., Maria, G., Open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the era of multimodality treatment of cancer., <<ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA>>, 2013; 2013 (Dicembre): 563-570 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/60908]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/60908
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact