A comparison of the sensitivity of several broad- and narrow-band vegetation indices (VIs) to leaf chlorophyll content in planophile crop canopies is addressed by the analysis of a large synthetic dataset. Broad-band indices included classical slope-based VIs (i.e. NDVI—normalized difference VI and SR—simple ratio) and some indices incorporating green reflectance (i.e. Green NDVI, NIR/green ratio and the newly proposed CVI—chlorophyll vegetation index), whereas narrow-band indices included those specifically proposed to estimate leaf chlorophyll at the canopy scale (i.e. MCARI—modified chlorophyll absorption reflectance index, TCARI—transformed CARI, TCARI/OSAVI ratio—TCARI/optimized soil adjusted VI and REIP—red edge inflection position). Synthetic data were obtained from the coupled PROSPECT ? SAILH leaf and canopy reflectance models in the direct mode. In addition to traditional regression-based statistics (coefficient of determination and root mean square error, RMSE), changes in sensitivity of a VI over the range of chlorophyll content were analyzed using a sensitivity function. The broad-band chlorophyll vegetation index outperformed the other VIs considered as a leaf chlorophyll estimator at the canopy scale, with the exception of the TCARI/OSAVI ratio for some soil conditions.

Frazzi, E., Vincini, M., Comparing narrow and broad-band vegetation indices to estimate leaf cholorophyll content in planophile crops canopies, <<PRECISION AGRICULTURE>>, 2011; (12): 334-344. [doi:10.1007/s11119-010-9204-3] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/5504]

Comparing narrow and broad-band vegetation indices to estimate leaf cholorophyll content in planophile crops canopies

Frazzi, Ermes;Vincini, Massimo
2011

Abstract

A comparison of the sensitivity of several broad- and narrow-band vegetation indices (VIs) to leaf chlorophyll content in planophile crop canopies is addressed by the analysis of a large synthetic dataset. Broad-band indices included classical slope-based VIs (i.e. NDVI—normalized difference VI and SR—simple ratio) and some indices incorporating green reflectance (i.e. Green NDVI, NIR/green ratio and the newly proposed CVI—chlorophyll vegetation index), whereas narrow-band indices included those specifically proposed to estimate leaf chlorophyll at the canopy scale (i.e. MCARI—modified chlorophyll absorption reflectance index, TCARI—transformed CARI, TCARI/OSAVI ratio—TCARI/optimized soil adjusted VI and REIP—red edge inflection position). Synthetic data were obtained from the coupled PROSPECT ? SAILH leaf and canopy reflectance models in the direct mode. In addition to traditional regression-based statistics (coefficient of determination and root mean square error, RMSE), changes in sensitivity of a VI over the range of chlorophyll content were analyzed using a sensitivity function. The broad-band chlorophyll vegetation index outperformed the other VIs considered as a leaf chlorophyll estimator at the canopy scale, with the exception of the TCARI/OSAVI ratio for some soil conditions.
eng
Frazzi, E., Vincini, M., Comparing narrow and broad-band vegetation indices to estimate leaf cholorophyll content in planophile crops canopies, <>, 2011; (12): 334-344. [doi:10.1007/s11119-010-9204-3] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/5504]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/5504
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact