The aim of the article is to systematically review published data about the comparison between positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in patients with different tumours.
Ciliberto, M., Maggi, F., Treglia, G., Padovano, F., Calandriello, L., Giordano, A., Bonomo, L., Comparison between whole-body MRI and Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET or PET/CT in oncology: a systematic review, <<RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY>>, 2013; 47 (3): 206-218. [doi:10.2478/raon-2013-0007] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/54326]
Comparison between whole-body MRI and Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET or PET/CT in oncology: a systematic review
Giordano, Alessandro;Bonomo, Lorenzo
2013
Abstract
The aim of the article is to systematically review published data about the comparison between positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in patients with different tumours.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
unpaywall-bitstream--67594934.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
313.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
313.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.