The overall diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for subepithelial lesions (SELs) is suboptimal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, defined as the proportion of correct diagnoses, obtained using the EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition (FNTA) sampling technique performed with the newly developed forward-viewing EUS scope (FV-EUS).

Larghi, A., Fuccio, L., Chiarello, G., Attili, F., Vanella, G., Paliani, G., Napoleone, M., Rindi, G., Larocca, L. M., Costamagna, G., Ricci, R., Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope, <<ENDOSCOPY>>, 2014; 46 (1): 39-45. [doi:10.1055/s-0033-1344895] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/53308]

Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope

Larghi, Alberto;Rindi, Guido;Larocca, Luigi Maria;Costamagna, Guido;Ricci, Riccardo
2014

Abstract

The overall diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for subepithelial lesions (SELs) is suboptimal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, defined as the proportion of correct diagnoses, obtained using the EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition (FNTA) sampling technique performed with the newly developed forward-viewing EUS scope (FV-EUS).
2014
Inglese
Larghi, A., Fuccio, L., Chiarello, G., Attili, F., Vanella, G., Paliani, G., Napoleone, M., Rindi, G., Larocca, L. M., Costamagna, G., Ricci, R., Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope, <<ENDOSCOPY>>, 2014; 46 (1): 39-45. [doi:10.1055/s-0033-1344895] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/53308]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/53308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 36
  • Scopus 84
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 76
social impact