The role of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-risk acute patients remains debated. Device-related complications and the more complex patient management could explain such lack of clinical benefit. We aimed to assess the impact of transradial versus transfemoral access for PCI requiring IABP support on vascular complications and clinical outcome.
Romagnoli, E., De Vita, M., Burzotta, F., Cortese, B., Biondi Zoccai, G., Summaria, F., Patrizi, R., Lanzillo, C., Lucci, V., Cavazza, C., Tarantino, F., Sangiorgi, G. M., Lioy, E., Crea, F., Rao, S. V., Trani, C., Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry, <<AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL>>, 2013; 166 (6): 1019-1026. [doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/52047]
Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry
Romagnoli, Enrico;De Vita, Maria;Burzotta, Francesco;Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe;Crea, Filippo;Trani, Carlo
2013
Abstract
The role of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-risk acute patients remains debated. Device-related complications and the more complex patient management could explain such lack of clinical benefit. We aimed to assess the impact of transradial versus transfemoral access for PCI requiring IABP support on vascular complications and clinical outcome.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
