Objectives.Workplace violence (WV) is an important occupational hazard for healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods.Alongitudinal study was carried out on HCWs from an infectious disease hospital. Work-related stress, anxiety, and depression were measured at baseline in 2003, and they were reassessed in 2005, along with the assaults that occurred in the previous year. Results. One-year prevalences of 6.2% and 13.9% were reported for physical and verbal aggressions, respectively. Perpetrators were mainly patients. The professional groups most frequently attacked were physicians, followed by nurses. Workers with job strain at baseline had a significant risk of being subject to aggression (OR 7.7; CI 95%, 3.3–17.9) in the following year.The relationship between job strain and subsequentWVremained significant even after correction for anxiety, depression, and other confounders.Conversely, experiencing WV was associated with a high risk of job strain and effort-reward imbalance in the following year.The final levels of anxiety and depression were predicted using regression models that included physical aggression among predictive variables. Conclusions.WV is the spark that sets off a problematic work situation. Effective prevention ofWVcan only be achieved within the framework of an overall improvement in the quality of work.

Magnavita, N., The exploding spark: workplace violence in an infectious disease hospital--a longitudinal study., <<BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL>>, 2013; (N/A): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1155/2013/316358] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/51016]

The exploding spark: workplace violence in an infectious disease hospital--a longitudinal study.

Magnavita, Nicola
2013

Abstract

Objectives.Workplace violence (WV) is an important occupational hazard for healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods.Alongitudinal study was carried out on HCWs from an infectious disease hospital. Work-related stress, anxiety, and depression were measured at baseline in 2003, and they were reassessed in 2005, along with the assaults that occurred in the previous year. Results. One-year prevalences of 6.2% and 13.9% were reported for physical and verbal aggressions, respectively. Perpetrators were mainly patients. The professional groups most frequently attacked were physicians, followed by nurses. Workers with job strain at baseline had a significant risk of being subject to aggression (OR 7.7; CI 95%, 3.3–17.9) in the following year.The relationship between job strain and subsequentWVremained significant even after correction for anxiety, depression, and other confounders.Conversely, experiencing WV was associated with a high risk of job strain and effort-reward imbalance in the following year.The final levels of anxiety and depression were predicted using regression models that included physical aggression among predictive variables. Conclusions.WV is the spark that sets off a problematic work situation. Effective prevention ofWVcan only be achieved within the framework of an overall improvement in the quality of work.
2013
Inglese
Magnavita, N., The exploding spark: workplace violence in an infectious disease hospital--a longitudinal study., <<BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL>>, 2013; (N/A): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1155/2013/316358] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/51016]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BMRI_violence_infect_2013.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.64 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/51016
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 26
  • Scopus 73
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 71
social impact