The aim of this study was to investigate, using eye-tracking technique, the influence of bottom-up and top-down processes on visual behavior while subjects, na ̈ıve to art criticism, were presented with representational paintings. Forty-two subjects viewed color and black and white paintings (Color) categorized as dynamic or static (Dynamism) (bottom-up processes). Half of the images represented natural environments and half human subjects (Content); all stimuli were displayed under aesthetic and movement judgment conditions (Task) (top-down processes). Results on gazing behavior showed that content-related top-down processes prevailed over low-level visually-driven bottom-up processes when a human subject is represented in the painting. On the contrary, bottom-up processes, mediated by low-level visual features, particularly affected gazing behavior when looking at nature-content images. We discuss our results proposing a reconsideration of the definition of content-related top-down processes in accordance with the concept of embodied simulation in art perception.

Massaro, D., Savazzi, F. A. M., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., Marchetti, A., When Art Moves the Eyes: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study, <<PLOS ONE>>, 2012; 7 (5): e37285-e37285. [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037285] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/5071]

When Art Moves the Eyes: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study

Massaro, Davide;Savazzi, Federica Antonia Maria;Di Dio, Cinzia;Gilli, Gabriella;Marchetti, Antonella
2012

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate, using eye-tracking technique, the influence of bottom-up and top-down processes on visual behavior while subjects, na ̈ıve to art criticism, were presented with representational paintings. Forty-two subjects viewed color and black and white paintings (Color) categorized as dynamic or static (Dynamism) (bottom-up processes). Half of the images represented natural environments and half human subjects (Content); all stimuli were displayed under aesthetic and movement judgment conditions (Task) (top-down processes). Results on gazing behavior showed that content-related top-down processes prevailed over low-level visually-driven bottom-up processes when a human subject is represented in the painting. On the contrary, bottom-up processes, mediated by low-level visual features, particularly affected gazing behavior when looking at nature-content images. We discuss our results proposing a reconsideration of the definition of content-related top-down processes in accordance with the concept of embodied simulation in art perception.
2012
AREA11 - SCIENZE STORICHE, FILOSOFICHE, PEDAGOGICHE E PSICOLOGICHE
Articolo su rivista internazionale
Inglese
Articolo in rivista
Inglese
eye tracking
aesthetic experience
embodied simulation
Settore M-PSI/04 - PSICOLOGIA DELLO SVILUPPO E PSICOLOGIA DELL'EDUCAZIONE
7
5
2012
e37285
e37285
Esperti non anonimi
Articolo su rivista scientifica / specializzata
online
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Massaro, D., Savazzi, F. A. M., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., Marchetti, A., When Art Moves the Eyes: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study, <<PLOS ONE>>, 2012; 7 (5): e37285-e37285. [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037285] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/5071]
open
262
Massaro, Davide; Savazzi, Federica Antonia Maria; Di Dio, Cinzia; Freedberg, D; Gallese, V; Gilli, Gabriella; Marchetti, Antonella
7
art_per_29
03. Contributo in rivista::Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Massaro et al 2012 391.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Final article
Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.37 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/5071
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 56
  • Scopus 192
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 160
social impact