OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a structured withdrawal program from a sublingual formulation of fast-melting oral desmopressin lyophilisate (MELT) is superior to a sudden withdrawal from this formulation in the treatment of monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three children presented to our pediatric nephrology outpatient clinic for bedwetting. Eighty-one children, aged between 5½ and 14 years (mean age 8.64 years), were treated with MELT at a dosage of 120 mcg a day. Responders were randomized to been withdrawn from therapy, after 3 months, abruptly or in a structured withdrawal program (60 mcg/day for 15 days and then 60 mcg every second evening for another 15 days). Main outcome parameter was relapse rate 1 month after the end of treatment. Relapse was defined as bedwetting occurring more than 2 nights per month after the 1-month treatment-free period. RESULTS: Relapse rate at 1 month after the end of treatment was 47.83% in the group on a structured program versus 45.83% in the abrupt termination group (p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a structured withdrawal program from MELT therapy doesn't offer advantages compared to an abrupt termination in children with monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis.
Ferrara, P., Romano, V., Cortina, I., Ianniello, F., Fabrizio, G. C., Chiaretti, A., Oral desmopressin lyophilisate (MELT) for monosymptomatic enuresis: Structured versus abrupt withdrawal., <<JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY>>, 2013; 2013 (Giugno): N/A-N/A [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/45813]
Oral desmopressin lyophilisate (MELT) for monosymptomatic enuresis: Structured versus abrupt withdrawal.
Ferrara, Pietro;Romano, Valerio;Ianniello, Francesca;Fabrizio, Giovanna Carmela;Chiaretti, Antonio
2013
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a structured withdrawal program from a sublingual formulation of fast-melting oral desmopressin lyophilisate (MELT) is superior to a sudden withdrawal from this formulation in the treatment of monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three children presented to our pediatric nephrology outpatient clinic for bedwetting. Eighty-one children, aged between 5½ and 14 years (mean age 8.64 years), were treated with MELT at a dosage of 120 mcg a day. Responders were randomized to been withdrawn from therapy, after 3 months, abruptly or in a structured withdrawal program (60 mcg/day for 15 days and then 60 mcg every second evening for another 15 days). Main outcome parameter was relapse rate 1 month after the end of treatment. Relapse was defined as bedwetting occurring more than 2 nights per month after the 1-month treatment-free period. RESULTS: Relapse rate at 1 month after the end of treatment was 47.83% in the group on a structured program versus 45.83% in the abrupt termination group (p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a structured withdrawal program from MELT therapy doesn't offer advantages compared to an abrupt termination in children with monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.