The A. focuses on the case of parents of a child born with deformities, which were recognized only near the end of pregnancy by the doctor. So they had claimed damages for the violation of right to abortion. The research attempts to face the issues regarding possibility to recover pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages from wrongful birth, both in terms of checking the hypothetical existence of the requirements for interrupting the pregnancy, both about the objective and subjective qualifications for allowing the claim for compensation in the system of civil liability for breach of contract.
Zecchin, F., Diagnosi tardiva e risarcimento del danno, <<DIRITTO DI FAMIGLIA E DELLE PERSONE>>, 2011; XL (3): 1131-1164 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/39754]
Diagnosi tardiva e risarcimento del danno
Zecchin, Francesco
2011
Abstract
The A. focuses on the case of parents of a child born with deformities, which were recognized only near the end of pregnancy by the doctor. So they had claimed damages for the violation of right to abortion. The research attempts to face the issues regarding possibility to recover pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages from wrongful birth, both in terms of checking the hypothetical existence of the requirements for interrupting the pregnancy, both about the objective and subjective qualifications for allowing the claim for compensation in the system of civil liability for breach of contract.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
