Ergonomic assessment of robotic surgical platforms for urological surgery: a study endorsed by the Robotic Urological Section of the European Association of Urology

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a growing concern in surgical practice, particularly in the context of robot-assisted surgery. Physical strain can significantly impact the well-being and performance of surgeons and surgical staff. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and severity of surgical strain among urologists using different available surgical platforms. METHODS: An anonymized, web-based survey was conducted between March and October 2024 using the REDCap platform. Distributed via professional networks and social media, the survey collected data on demographics, surgical experience, platform usage, and self-reported physical discomfort. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests, with P<0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 427 urologists participated. Most console surgeons (up to 83% for one robotic system variant) reported some level of physical discomfort. Discomfort was also reported by 83% of open surgeons and 80% of bedside assistants, the latter of whom had the highest incidence of injury (53%) from robotic arms. A noteworthy subset of survey respondents required physiotherapy (13-15%), medical (6-11%), or surgical (2-3.8%) interventions due to physical strain. No significant differences were observed by age or sex among console users. CONCLUSIONS: Ergonomic strain is prevalent among urologic surgeons, regardless of surgical platform, with bedside assistants particularly vulnerable. These findings underscore the need for ergonomic training, physical conditioning, and design improvements in surgical systems to safeguard surgeon health and maintain procedural efficacy.