Background/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and the learning curve of an insourced, clinician-performed three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction workflow using Synapse3D™ software in a robotic urologic surgery setting. Methods: In this prospective single-centre case series, 20 consecutive patients scheduled for robotic kidney surgery were enrolled over a 30-day period. Three urology residents without prior experience in 3D reconstruction completed a structured two-day training programme including eight supervised practice reconstructions. Subsequently, each one reconstructed all 20 study cases independently. Reconstruction time was recorded for every reconstruction. After surgery, the two operating surgeons independently rated each model on a 5-point Likert scale for anatomical fidelity, defined as the correspondence between the model and the anatomy encountered intraoperatively. Results: All 60 reconstructions were completed successfully, with no failed reconstructions, no DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) import errors and no software crashes; assistance from the manufacturer was never required. Mean reconstruction time was 19 min (range 11–29 min). Reconstruction time decreased by 0.63 min per case (95% CI 0.51–0.74; p < 0.001). Median time fell from 23 min in the first ten cases to 15 min in the last ten (p < 0.001), and the reduction was significant for each operator analysed separately. Anatomical fidelity was rated 4 (IQR 1) by both surgeons. The two surgeons rated overall system usability 3/5 and 5/5. Conclusions: Insourced 3D reconstruction with Synapse3D™ is technically feasible and is learned rapidly and reproducibly by urology residents after limited training.

Fettucciari, D., Bracco, M., Carerj, C., Gavi, F., Rossi, F., Pallotta, G., Assumma, S., Panio, E., Francocci, A., Cavarra, V., Montesi, M., Testori, N., Russo, P., Turri, F. M., Totaro, A., Gandi, C., Foschi, N., D'Amico, L., Bizzarri, F. P., Sacco, E., Pavone, M., Gaia, G., Rocco, B. M. C., Sighinolfi, M. C., Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software, <<CANCERS>>, 2026; 18 (16): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/cancers18162692] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/345789]

Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software

Fettucciari, Daniele;Bracco, Martina;Carerj, Cristina;Gavi, Filippo;Rossi, Francesco;Pallotta, Giuseppe;Panio, Enrico;Francocci, Alessandra;Cavarra, Vincenzo;Montesi, Marco;Testori, Nicoletta;Turri, Filippo Maria;Totaro, Angelo;Gandi, Carlo;Foschi, Nazario;D'Amico, Lorenzo;Bizzarri, Francesco Pio;Sacco, Emilio;Pavone, Matteo;Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare;Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
2026

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and the learning curve of an insourced, clinician-performed three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction workflow using Synapse3D™ software in a robotic urologic surgery setting. Methods: In this prospective single-centre case series, 20 consecutive patients scheduled for robotic kidney surgery were enrolled over a 30-day period. Three urology residents without prior experience in 3D reconstruction completed a structured two-day training programme including eight supervised practice reconstructions. Subsequently, each one reconstructed all 20 study cases independently. Reconstruction time was recorded for every reconstruction. After surgery, the two operating surgeons independently rated each model on a 5-point Likert scale for anatomical fidelity, defined as the correspondence between the model and the anatomy encountered intraoperatively. Results: All 60 reconstructions were completed successfully, with no failed reconstructions, no DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) import errors and no software crashes; assistance from the manufacturer was never required. Mean reconstruction time was 19 min (range 11–29 min). Reconstruction time decreased by 0.63 min per case (95% CI 0.51–0.74; p < 0.001). Median time fell from 23 min in the first ten cases to 15 min in the last ten (p < 0.001), and the reduction was significant for each operator analysed separately. Anatomical fidelity was rated 4 (IQR 1) by both surgeons. The two surgeons rated overall system usability 3/5 and 5/5. Conclusions: Insourced 3D reconstruction with Synapse3D™ is technically feasible and is learned rapidly and reproducibly by urology residents after limited training.
2026
Inglese
Fettucciari, D., Bracco, M., Carerj, C., Gavi, F., Rossi, F., Pallotta, G., Assumma, S., Panio, E., Francocci, A., Cavarra, V., Montesi, M., Testori, N., Russo, P., Turri, F. M., Totaro, A., Gandi, C., Foschi, N., D'Amico, L., Bizzarri, F. P., Sacco, E., Pavone, M., Gaia, G., Rocco, B. M. C., Sighinolfi, M. C., Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software, <<CANCERS>>, 2026; 18 (16): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/cancers18162692] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/345789]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
feas.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.63 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/345789
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact