INTRODUCTION The optimal antithrombotic regimen for chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring long-term anticoagulation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine the effects of oral anticoagulation (OAC) monotherapy in comparison with OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (OAC+SAPT) on cardiovascular mortality in chronic CAD. The secondary objective was to assess the effects of both antithrombotic approaches on major bleeding, nonfatal ischemic events, and all-cause death. PATIENTS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL (up to August 2025) for randomized trials comparing OAC alone vs OAC+SAPT in chronic CAD. Fixed-effects models were used when heterogeneity was low (I² <50%); otherwise, random-effects models were applied. Prespecified sensitivity analyses included a Bayesian meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death; secondary outcomes were all-cause death, major bleeding, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. RESULTS Five trials (AFIRE, AQUATIC, EPIC-CAD, OAC-ALONE, and PRAEDO AF; n = 4964; follow-up range, 12–30 mo) met the eligibility criteria. Cardiovascular death occurred in 2.7% of the patients on OAC alone vs 3.8% on OAC+SAPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.5–0.96; P = 0.02). The Bayesian analysis confirmed the result (HR, 0.75; 95% credible interval, 0.61–0.93). TSA crossed the efficacy boundary, supporting firm evidence for cardiovascular mortality reduction with OAC alone. All-cause mortality was numerically, but not significantly, lower on OAC alone (4.9% vs 6.7%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.5–1.24; P = 0.3). Major bleeding was reduced on OAC alone (3.3% vs 6.4%; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39–0.66; P <0.001). Myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke incidence did not differ significantly in the treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS In chronic CAD requiring anticoagulation, OAC monotherapy vs OAC+SAPT reduced cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding without an excess in nonfatal thrombotic events, generally supporting OAC alone as the preferred long-term strategy in this patient population.
Navarese, E. P., Kereiakes, D. J., Henry, T. D., Isgender, M., Talanas, G., Kubica, J., Farkouh, M. E., Andreotti, F., Increased cardiovascular mortality with single antiplatelet therapy in anticoagulation-treated chronic coronary syndrome patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials, <<POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ>>, 2026; 136 (2): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.20452/pamw.17201] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/341063]
Increased cardiovascular mortality with single antiplatelet therapy in anticoagulation-treated chronic coronary syndrome patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials
Andreotti, Felicita
2026
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal antithrombotic regimen for chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring long-term anticoagulation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine the effects of oral anticoagulation (OAC) monotherapy in comparison with OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (OAC+SAPT) on cardiovascular mortality in chronic CAD. The secondary objective was to assess the effects of both antithrombotic approaches on major bleeding, nonfatal ischemic events, and all-cause death. PATIENTS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL (up to August 2025) for randomized trials comparing OAC alone vs OAC+SAPT in chronic CAD. Fixed-effects models were used when heterogeneity was low (I² <50%); otherwise, random-effects models were applied. Prespecified sensitivity analyses included a Bayesian meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death; secondary outcomes were all-cause death, major bleeding, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. RESULTS Five trials (AFIRE, AQUATIC, EPIC-CAD, OAC-ALONE, and PRAEDO AF; n = 4964; follow-up range, 12–30 mo) met the eligibility criteria. Cardiovascular death occurred in 2.7% of the patients on OAC alone vs 3.8% on OAC+SAPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.5–0.96; P = 0.02). The Bayesian analysis confirmed the result (HR, 0.75; 95% credible interval, 0.61–0.93). TSA crossed the efficacy boundary, supporting firm evidence for cardiovascular mortality reduction with OAC alone. All-cause mortality was numerically, but not significantly, lower on OAC alone (4.9% vs 6.7%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.5–1.24; P = 0.3). Major bleeding was reduced on OAC alone (3.3% vs 6.4%; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39–0.66; P <0.001). Myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke incidence did not differ significantly in the treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS In chronic CAD requiring anticoagulation, OAC monotherapy vs OAC+SAPT reduced cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding without an excess in nonfatal thrombotic events, generally supporting OAC alone as the preferred long-term strategy in this patient population.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PAIM-25-00324_Navarese_orig.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
439.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
439.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



