Digital health technologies present a "comfort-growth paradox," a fundamental tension between the need for systems to be both predictable for user comfort and disruptive for therapeutic growth. This paper argues that cyberpsychology provides the essential conceptual tools to navigate this challenge. Technologies must offer psychological safety to build trust and reduce cognitive load, yet true behavioral and cognitive development requires engaging with challenges that stretch users' capabilities. The very comfort that fosters engagement can inadvertently constrain progress if it fails to introduce necessary, growth-oriented discomfort. To resolve this, the paper draws on the technological adaptation of psychological theories such as Flow Theory, the Transtheoretical Model of Change, Presence and Embodiment, and Self-Determination Theory. These models inform practical implementation strategies, including progressive scaffolding to gradually reduce support, enhancing user agency through customizable challenges, providing multiple modalities of support, and fostering metacognitive awareness of the comfort-growth dynamic. By integrating these approaches, designers can create adaptive systems that balance comfort and challenge in real-time. The ultimate goal is to develop technologies that serve not just as tools for managing illness but as partners in human flourishing.

Riva, G., Brizzi, G., De Gaspari, S., La Rocca, S., Longoni, F., Noselli, E., Pupillo, C., Passalacqua, G., Rabarbari, E., Sajno, E., Sansoni, M., Wiederhold, B. K., The Comfort-Growth Paradox of Technology: A Cyberpsychological Compass for Innovation, <<ANNUAL REVIEW OF CYBERTHERAPY AND TELEMEDICINE>>, 2025; 23 (N/A): 3-10 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/338650]

The Comfort-Growth Paradox of Technology: A Cyberpsychological Compass for Innovation

Riva, Giuseppe;Brizzi, Giulia;De Gaspari, Stefano;La Rocca, Stefania;Longoni, Federico;Noselli, Eleonora;Pupillo, Chiara;Passalacqua, Giuseppe;Rabarbari, Elisa;Sajno, Elena;Sansoni, Maria;
2025

Abstract

Digital health technologies present a "comfort-growth paradox," a fundamental tension between the need for systems to be both predictable for user comfort and disruptive for therapeutic growth. This paper argues that cyberpsychology provides the essential conceptual tools to navigate this challenge. Technologies must offer psychological safety to build trust and reduce cognitive load, yet true behavioral and cognitive development requires engaging with challenges that stretch users' capabilities. The very comfort that fosters engagement can inadvertently constrain progress if it fails to introduce necessary, growth-oriented discomfort. To resolve this, the paper draws on the technological adaptation of psychological theories such as Flow Theory, the Transtheoretical Model of Change, Presence and Embodiment, and Self-Determination Theory. These models inform practical implementation strategies, including progressive scaffolding to gradually reduce support, enhancing user agency through customizable challenges, providing multiple modalities of support, and fostering metacognitive awareness of the comfort-growth dynamic. By integrating these approaches, designers can create adaptive systems that balance comfort and challenge in real-time. The ultimate goal is to develop technologies that serve not just as tools for managing illness but as partners in human flourishing.
2025
Inglese
Riva, G., Brizzi, G., De Gaspari, S., La Rocca, S., Longoni, F., Noselli, E., Pupillo, C., Passalacqua, G., Rabarbari, E., Sajno, E., Sansoni, M., Wiederhold, B. K., The Comfort-Growth Paradox of Technology: A Cyberpsychological Compass for Innovation, <<ANNUAL REVIEW OF CYBERTHERAPY AND TELEMEDICINE>>, 2025; 23 (N/A): 3-10 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/338650]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/338650
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact