Erratum: ER to: Effects of peripartal rumen-derived direct-fed microbial supplementation on lactation performance, metabolism, ruminal fermentation, and microbial abundance in dairy cows (Journal of Dairy Science (2025) 108(3) (2354–2370), (S0022030224013468), (10.3168/jds.2024-25058))

In this article, the abstract contained incorrect information in the sentence, “Compared with CON, GF cows had lower blood plasma glucose and higher BHB.” The blood plasma glucose was lower for control diet plus a rumen-derived DFM product (GF) cows, but the BHB levels were not higher because there was no treatment effect. The corrected sentence appears in situ in bold below. Although DMI was not affected by treatment, GF cows had greater feed efficiency (+0.18, milk/DMI) in the postfresh period. Compared with CON, GF cows had lower blood plasma glucose. Blood biomarkers showed greater concentrations of ceruloplasmin, haptoglobin, and reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM) in GF cows compared with CON. Additionally, the starch percentage for the close-up diet in Table 2 [Table presented] was incorrect. The correct percentage appears in bold in the table on the following page. The authors regret the error.