Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential to improve antibiotic prescribing. This study evaluated the impact of a post-prescription audit and feedback intervention on carbapenem prescribing appropriateness in a large university hospital. Methods This retrospective observational study utilized interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, employing an Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, to assess carbapenem prescribing across three consecutive phases: a 12-month pre-intervention, a 6-month intervention, and a 6-month post-intervention follow-up. Carbapenem prescribing appropriateness was retrospectively evaluated using an in-house developed algorithm, based on international and national guidelines and institutional protocols. The intervention involved bedside consultations by infectious diseases specialists employing a post-prescription audit with face-to-face feedback. Results We evaluated 1825 carbapenem therapies, primarily prescribed for suspected/confirmed bloodstream infections (46%, 843/1825). Among these, 458 (25%) were deemed inappropriate, mainly due to unnecessarily broad-spectrum use (72%, 331/458). The ITS-ARIMA model showed an immediate 11% reduction in the rate of inappropriate prescriptions during the first month of intervention phase (P = 0.001), followed by a non-significant downward trend during the remaining intervention period. However, an immediate 14.9% increase in inappropriate prescriptions was observed at the onset of the post-intervention phase (P = 0.001), indicating a rebound effect after the withdrawal of the active stewardship intervention. Conclusions Implementing a post-prescription audit and face-to-face feedback intervention was associated with a short-term improvement in carbapenem prescribing appropriateness. We observed a reduction in the trend of inappropriateness, although this change was not statistically significant. Future studies should investigate strategies for implementing sustainable ASPs optimizing human resources and time investment.

Sangiorgi, F., Del Vecchio, P., Magrini, E., Rando, E., Liguoro, B., Frater, A., Giovannenze, F., Fantoni, M., Torti, C., Murri, R., Impact of a post-prescription audit and feedback antimicrobial stewardship intervention on inappropriate carbapenem prescribing: An interrupted time series analysis, <<JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE>>, 2025; 7 (6): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf236] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/337123]

Impact of a post-prescription audit and feedback antimicrobial stewardship intervention on inappropriate carbapenem prescribing: An interrupted time series analysis

Del Vecchio, Pierluigi;Magrini, Eugenia;Liguoro, Beatrice;Frater, Alessia;Giovannenze, Francesca;Fantoni, Massimo;Torti, Carlo;Murri, Rita
2025

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential to improve antibiotic prescribing. This study evaluated the impact of a post-prescription audit and feedback intervention on carbapenem prescribing appropriateness in a large university hospital. Methods This retrospective observational study utilized interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, employing an Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, to assess carbapenem prescribing across three consecutive phases: a 12-month pre-intervention, a 6-month intervention, and a 6-month post-intervention follow-up. Carbapenem prescribing appropriateness was retrospectively evaluated using an in-house developed algorithm, based on international and national guidelines and institutional protocols. The intervention involved bedside consultations by infectious diseases specialists employing a post-prescription audit with face-to-face feedback. Results We evaluated 1825 carbapenem therapies, primarily prescribed for suspected/confirmed bloodstream infections (46%, 843/1825). Among these, 458 (25%) were deemed inappropriate, mainly due to unnecessarily broad-spectrum use (72%, 331/458). The ITS-ARIMA model showed an immediate 11% reduction in the rate of inappropriate prescriptions during the first month of intervention phase (P = 0.001), followed by a non-significant downward trend during the remaining intervention period. However, an immediate 14.9% increase in inappropriate prescriptions was observed at the onset of the post-intervention phase (P = 0.001), indicating a rebound effect after the withdrawal of the active stewardship intervention. Conclusions Implementing a post-prescription audit and face-to-face feedback intervention was associated with a short-term improvement in carbapenem prescribing appropriateness. We observed a reduction in the trend of inappropriateness, although this change was not statistically significant. Future studies should investigate strategies for implementing sustainable ASPs optimizing human resources and time investment.
2025
Inglese
Sangiorgi, F., Del Vecchio, P., Magrini, E., Rando, E., Liguoro, B., Frater, A., Giovannenze, F., Fantoni, M., Torti, C., Murri, R., Impact of a post-prescription audit and feedback antimicrobial stewardship intervention on inappropriate carbapenem prescribing: An interrupted time series analysis, <<JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE>>, 2025; 7 (6): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf236] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/337123]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/337123
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact