Background: Physiology-guided drug eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention (ph DES-PCI) improves cardiovascular outcomes; however, the clinical benefit of ph drug coated balloon PCI (ph DCB-PCI) remains unclear. Results: A propensity-matched analysis of 39 patient pairs (ph DCB-PCI versus ph DES-PCI) from the PROPHET-FFR registry was performed. At 13  months, the MACE rate was similar between the groups (5.1 versus 7.6%, P = 0.644), principally driven by target-vessel revascularization (2.6 versus 7.6%, P = 0.305). A single periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in the ph DCB-PCI group (P = 0.314). Major findings: Ph DCB-PCI appears feasible in selected patients, with no apparent signal of worse outcomes compared with ph DES-PCI, supporting a potential role for physiological assessment in stentless revascularization strategies.

Galante, D., Pollio Benvenuto, C., Todisco, S., Viceré, A., Giuliana, C., Viccaro, V., Tarzia, P., Aurigemma, C., Romagnoli, E., Montone, R., Trani, C., Burzotta, F., Crea, F., Leone, A. M., Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent: a propensity-matched analysis, <<JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE>>, 2026; 27 (5): 362-365. [doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001884] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/337099]

Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent: a propensity-matched analysis

Pollio Benvenuto, Ciro;Todisco, Simona;Giuliana, Chiara;Viccaro, Vincenzo;Aurigemma, Cristina;Romagnoli, Enrico;Trani, Carlo;Burzotta, Francesco;Crea, Filippo;Leone, Antonio Maria
2026

Abstract

Background: Physiology-guided drug eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention (ph DES-PCI) improves cardiovascular outcomes; however, the clinical benefit of ph drug coated balloon PCI (ph DCB-PCI) remains unclear. Results: A propensity-matched analysis of 39 patient pairs (ph DCB-PCI versus ph DES-PCI) from the PROPHET-FFR registry was performed. At 13  months, the MACE rate was similar between the groups (5.1 versus 7.6%, P = 0.644), principally driven by target-vessel revascularization (2.6 versus 7.6%, P = 0.305). A single periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in the ph DCB-PCI group (P = 0.314). Major findings: Ph DCB-PCI appears feasible in selected patients, with no apparent signal of worse outcomes compared with ph DES-PCI, supporting a potential role for physiological assessment in stentless revascularization strategies.
2026
Inglese
Galante, D., Pollio Benvenuto, C., Todisco, S., Viceré, A., Giuliana, C., Viccaro, V., Tarzia, P., Aurigemma, C., Romagnoli, E., Montone, R., Trani, C., Burzotta, F., Crea, F., Leone, A. M., Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent: a propensity-matched analysis, <<JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE>>, 2026; 27 (5): 362-365. [doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001884] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/337099]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/337099
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact