Purpose: Aim of the study was to evaluate the role of the mechanical properties of the rod and of the characteristics of the patients (age, skeletal maturity, BMI, and Lenke type) in determining the deformity correction, its maintenance over time and the risk of mechanical failure of the instrumentation.Methods: From March 2011 to December 2014 120 patients affected by AIS underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Two 5.5-mm CoCr rods were implanted in all patients. For every patient, age, sex, Risser grade, Lenke type curve, flexibility of the main curve, body mass index (BMI), and percentage of correction were recorded. In all patients, the Cobb angle value and rod curvature angle (RC) were evaluated. RC changes were registered and correlated to each factor to establish a possible statistically significance in a multivariate analysis. A biomechanical model was constructed to study the influence of rod diameter and material as well as the density of the anchoring implants in determining stress and deformation of rods after contouring and implantation.Results: Radiographic and biomechanical analysis showed a different mean rod deformation for concave and convex side: 7.8 degrees and 3.9 degrees, respectively. RC mean value at immediate follow-up was 21.8 degrees for the concave side and 14.6 degrees for the convex. At 2-year minimum follow-up, RC value increases 1.5 degrees only for the concave side. At 3.5-year mean follow-up, RC value increases 2.7 degrees, p = 0.003, for the concave side and 1.3 degrees for the convex, p = 0.06. The use of the stiffest material as well as of the lowest diameter resulted in higher stresses in the rods. The use of either a low or a high instrumentation density resulted only in minor differences in the loss of correction.Conclusions: Rod diameter and material as well as patient characteristics such as BMI, age, and Risser grade play an important role in deformity correction and its maintenance over time.
Giudici, F., Galbusera, F., Zagra, A., Wilke, H., Archetti, M., Scaramuzzo, L., Determinants of the biomechanical and radiological outcome of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: the role of rod properties and patient characteristics, <<EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL>>, 2017; 26 (S4): 524-532. [doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5148-x] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/335797]
Determinants of the biomechanical and radiological outcome of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: the role of rod properties and patient characteristics
Scaramuzzo, Laura
2017
Abstract
Purpose: Aim of the study was to evaluate the role of the mechanical properties of the rod and of the characteristics of the patients (age, skeletal maturity, BMI, and Lenke type) in determining the deformity correction, its maintenance over time and the risk of mechanical failure of the instrumentation.Methods: From March 2011 to December 2014 120 patients affected by AIS underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Two 5.5-mm CoCr rods were implanted in all patients. For every patient, age, sex, Risser grade, Lenke type curve, flexibility of the main curve, body mass index (BMI), and percentage of correction were recorded. In all patients, the Cobb angle value and rod curvature angle (RC) were evaluated. RC changes were registered and correlated to each factor to establish a possible statistically significance in a multivariate analysis. A biomechanical model was constructed to study the influence of rod diameter and material as well as the density of the anchoring implants in determining stress and deformation of rods after contouring and implantation.Results: Radiographic and biomechanical analysis showed a different mean rod deformation for concave and convex side: 7.8 degrees and 3.9 degrees, respectively. RC mean value at immediate follow-up was 21.8 degrees for the concave side and 14.6 degrees for the convex. At 2-year minimum follow-up, RC value increases 1.5 degrees only for the concave side. At 3.5-year mean follow-up, RC value increases 2.7 degrees, p = 0.003, for the concave side and 1.3 degrees for the convex, p = 0.06. The use of the stiffest material as well as of the lowest diameter resulted in higher stresses in the rods. The use of either a low or a high instrumentation density resulted only in minor differences in the loss of correction.Conclusions: Rod diameter and material as well as patient characteristics such as BMI, age, and Risser grade play an important role in deformity correction and its maintenance over time.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



